Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:50:17 +0200 From: Peter van Dijk <peter@dataloss.nl> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux Message-ID: <20050919065017.GC17888@dataloss.nl> In-Reply-To: <200509190637.j8J6bxu6095963@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <20050919.004531.92589257.mshindo@mshindo.net> <432D9249.9090202@mac.com> <432DA0AC.8010802@thedarkside.nl> <432DA922.5030303@errno.com> <200509190606.j8J66JbO095192@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <20050919063322.GA17888@dataloss.nl> <200509190637.j8J6bxu6095963@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:37:59PM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > OK, enabling bridge is useless unless you bridge a pair of interfaces :) > > But that ARP thing happens also with interfaces that are not part of > the bridge! Even if the interfaces are ifconfiged NOARP. This is not what I observed... which of the 3 bridging implementations (bridge, if_bridge, ng_bridge) have you seen this behaviour with? Cheers, Peter -- peter@dataloss.nl | ~ tonight tonight, what is this potion http://blog.dataloss.nl/ | ~ that makes a fool of me UnderNet/#clue | Wayfinder, fr-025 soundtrack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050919065017.GC17888>