Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:38:48 -0700
From:      Eric L Camachat <eric.camachat@gmail.com>
To:        Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>
Cc:        Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com>, FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ipv6_activate_all_interfaces doesn't work on wireless interface.
Message-ID:  <1376761128.1922.2.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1vPbcC7uQ0pa0UMZwS0yRP1HE6gX3Rb8h0f-rqcWtoibQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <1376632058.1841.6.camel@localhost> <CA%2B7WWSejw14ZhgVUjbjH-VjZh4A0yaLt2R8XeL77Back995qNw@mail.gmail.com> <CACeEFf7iJGNfLjiC-8Ev=am5pE7pEKJuOpPLnTbXJhEFkO-MjQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1vPbcC7uQ0pa0UMZwS0yRP1HE6gX3Rb8h0f-rqcWtoibQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 10:18 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:

> There was a revision to networks.subr in r253683 that removed
> accept_rtadv from default for bridge interfaces.
> 
> At least the comment says that it should not be default which implies
> that it used to be. If there is a logic error in the commit (I just
> noted the change to rtadv and the comment, but did not attempt to
> confirm the logic), perhaps accept_rtadv got turned off on more than
> just bridge interfaces.
> 
> 
> 
> 564
>  
> 
>  bridge[0-9]*)
> 565
>  
> 
>    # No accept_rtadv by
> default on if_bridge(4)
> 566
>  
> 
>    # to avoid a
> conflict with the
> member
> 567
>  
> 
>    # interfaces.
> 568
>  
> 
>    return 1
> 569
>  
>                  ;;
> 570
>  
>                  *)
> 

That script affect only when ipv6_enable="YES" for backward
compatibility, from its comments.

Eric






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1376761128.1922.2.camel>