Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 16:33:02 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 270867] xargs -E is not working properly Message-ID: <bug-270867-227-PEJEJ7ylRo@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-270867-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-270867-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D270867 --- Comment #3 from Yuri Pankov <yuripv@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Yuri Pankov from comment #2) And there's a commit that changed strcmp() into strncmp(): commit 4aeb63826e0f9ce817b16abdb1501490307d857c Author: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat Dec 31 09:06:45 2005 +0000 Check the entire length of the current argument for the EOF string with= -E, but don't expect a proper ASCII string to exist right here right now, d= on't use strcmp(3) which checks for a NUL. As we're still building the argu= ment up, the next character might be garbage. It would probably be just as = safe to temporarily write a NUL there, but if we've reached the end of argument memory that might not be the best idea, I think. It's unclear. Doing it this way seems to meet the most with the original intent. PR: 85696 Prodded by: stefanf Checking if what's described in bug 85696 is still a problem with strcmp().= .. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-270867-227-PEJEJ7ylRo>