Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 15:21:12 -0500 From: Jim Knoble <jmknoble@pobox.com> To: David Rankin <drankin@bohemians.lexington.ky.us>, Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Markus Friedl <markus.friedl@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>, "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw@wittsend.com>, Dug Song <dugsong@monkey.org>, security@FreeBSD.org, openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal Message-ID: <20000103152112.C18625@ntrnet.net> In-Reply-To: <20000103092733.B3780@rumpole.bohemians.lexington.ky.us>; from David Rankin on Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 09:27:33AM -0500 References: <20000102151208.A21548@folly.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10001021441330.8076-100000@green.dyndns.org> <20000103092733.B3780@rumpole.bohemians.lexington.ky.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is there a reason why we ought not to use openssh-unix-dev? It's already here, and i suspect most folks on the list would be interested in an SSH-Protocol-2.0 implementation. I don't particularly think it's off-topic, either (except for the bit about whether certain folks can be communicated with effectively). -- jim knoble jmknoble@pobox.com På 2000-Jan-03 klokka 09:27:33 -0500 skrivet David Rankin: : Since it looks like there's a significant interest in this, I propose : that we look at an "OpenSSH 2" project. At this point, we need a mailing : list. I'd love to host the list, but the US laws make that too painful for : me should someone post encryption code. : : Once we get someone to make a list, I think we can start working on : the details. No use flooding security@FreeBSD.org or openssh-dev-list : with a lot of off-topic discussion (and can stop the monster CC:... :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000103152112.C18625>