Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:24:45 +0100 From: Martin Wilke <unixfreunde@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portsnap support on CURRENT Message-ID: <20060211112445.30c58c1a@mwilke.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <200602101440.50440.fcash@ocis.net> References: <1139607813.23382.20.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> <200602101440.50440.fcash@ocis.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:40:49 -0800 Freddie Cash <fcash@ocis.net> wrote: > On Friday 10 February 2006 01:43 pm, Paul Mather wrote: > > I've noticed lately a lot of "succeeds port" messages when I run > > portversion (from the portupgrade port) to list which of my packages > > are out of date and require updating. These messages are incorrect > > (i.e., the "port has" version identified by portversion is older > > than that in the actual port Makefile), and I don't get incorrect > > identifications from either pkg_version or portmanager. (I also > > don't get this problem on a RELENG_6 system I have, either.) > > > After a little looking, I discovered that my /usr/ports/INDEX-7 > > file is not being updated. Investigation of the portsnap source > > reveals that it only actually generates INDEX, INDEX-5, and INDEX-6 > > from portsnap updates in extract_indices(); it doesn't generate > > INDEX-7. > > Workarounds until portsnap does it again, in order of length of time > to generate INDEX-7: > cd /usr/ports ; make fetchindex > cd usr/ports ; make index > pkgdb -U > Hi i have in my make.conf INDEXFILE=INDEX-6 this works. Greets Martin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD7btvFRZ/kBT4vp8RAvStAKCKzZGNtaUgsg/Nmlq/Vb/MGBUQ+gCgjN1G x6Z+GVckrngVVEAljnT1BxE= =P7Pg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060211112445.30c58c1a>