Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:41:21 -0200 (BRST) From: "Michel Santos" <michel@lucenet.com.br> To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> Subject: Re: diskio low read performance Message-ID: <64857.200.152.83.36.1168710081.squirrel@webmail.matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20070113164232.GA34348@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <64656.200.152.83.36.1168651673.squirrel@webmail.matik.com.br> <45A87878.1050505@paradise.net.nz> <63758.200.152.83.36.1168689227.squirrel@webmail.matik.com.br> <20070113164232.GA34348@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway disse na ultima mensagem: > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:53:47AM -0200, Michel Santos wrote: > >> I forgot to say that I tried it already. Even if it gave me no >> improvement >> I have it in 16 at this time together with a higher >> vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem >> value. >> >> Sincerley, any of the configuration changes I did gave me absolutely >> nothing in relationship to the disk read access performance. That is >> disappointing. >> >> Should I go back and try ufs1 perhaps? Or is it that squid does not work >> well on 6.2? > > Is it the same version of squid, same configuration, etc? > > Kris > Yes, if you used to squid I am running the last 2.5-Stable14 version which run best on 4.11 Michel computador é como nem cavalo e mulher mais que montam neles, pior que ficam ... **************************************************** Datacenter Matik http://datacenter.matik.com.br E-Mail e Data Hosting Service para Profissionais. ****************************************************
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?64857.200.152.83.36.1168710081.squirrel>