Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:30:29 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there any modern alternative to pstack? Message-ID: <20120415093029.GR2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <4F8A8CD2.5020103@rawbw.com> References: <4F775DF5.1020704@rawbw.com> <4F7CA124.8080401@freebsd.org> <CAF6rxg=QHBKUwWEUO2JRP1hYcDVfg4pM_4BTO6jPu1FmPeWDxA@mail.gmail.com> <201204051006.11598.jhb@freebsd.org> <4F8A8CD2.5020103@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 01:54:42AM -0700, Yuri wrote: > On 04/05/2012 07:06, John Baldwin wrote: > >In this case we probably should become the upstream maintainer. My patch > >actually bumps the version to 1.3 as it is sort of intended to do that. > > bsd-pstack on SourceForge is dead. Sole project owner isn't responsive, > and as per SF policy they don't allow anyone to take over such project. > They suggest to fork. > So will you object if I create a new project on SF, say bsd-pstack-new, > will import the current source and apply your patch and make a release? > I will also update pstack port so that it will become current. It seems that the license is two-clause BSD. My opinion is that such tool should be imported into the base. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+KlTUACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4gzsQCeJZ4/mFW9Ahcsez0xXslnNYtD GhsAn2sa6oQ5/BENMEvmQFOiW9nwUoZK =f/zU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120415093029.GR2358>