Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:29:59 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@corecode.ath.cx> Cc: hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org, hitmaster2k@yahoo.com, bts@babbleon.org, kris@obsecurity.org, freebsd-user@netscum.dyndns.dk, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Performance of FreeBSD vs NetBSD (was: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable) Message-ID: <20020311072959.B43252@iguana.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20020311162631.7321fc96.corecode@corecode.ath.cx> References: <20020311064831.A42820@iguana.icir.org> <20020311151031.14799.qmail@web21108.mail.yahoo.com> <20020311162631.7321fc96.corecode@corecode.ath.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 04:26:31PM +0100, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:10:31 -0800 (PST) Hiten Pandya <hitmaster2k@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > --- Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> wrote: > > > As I already asked: > > > what compile time options were used in the two cases ? > > > They surely can make a huge difference. > > > > > > cheers > > > luigi > > > > > > > Could it also be a possibility, that the NetBSD defaults differ from > > the FreeBSD defaults, I think this could make some difference too. :) > > actually he mentioned in his post that he used the _same_ binary on fbsd > and netbsd (statically linked, netbsd with fbsd emu layer) actually later in the same message he mentioned he used a different binary, and the "top" output showed two different names. luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020311072959.B43252>