Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:35:43 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r227798 - in head: . lib/libpam lib/libpam/modules Message-ID: <861uszkfgw.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20111122204154.GA14090@stack.nl> (Jilles Tjoelker's message of "Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:41:55 %2B0100") References: <201111211640.pALGedXg051270@svn.freebsd.org> <20111122204154.GA14090@stack.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> writes: > Although this will work, I think it trades the quality of the binaries > for a cleaner build system. It is better to pass all libraries to ld(1) > even though a .so may have unresolved references: the NEEDED entry > serves as an additional protection against version mismatches and symbol > versioning (if you ever add it) requires ld(1) to have access to the .so > containing the definition so it knows the version name to store in the > output file. These are plugins. The names and prototypes of the functions they export were set in stone 15 years ago. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?861uszkfgw.fsf>