Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:30:50 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, sthaug@nethelp.no Subject: Re: CVS removal from the base Message-ID: <201112111430.pBBEUoBc064463@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:24:50 %2B0600." <CADe0-4m-p4umXQst%2Bb8DGFcUnct9P6PQCjQd5HXc3YPmNevCSw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:03 PM, <sthaug@nethelp.no> wrote: > > > I use CVS (or rather csup) to keep the base system up to date. I would > > be perfectly okay with using a different utility - however, I would > > strongly prefer that this utility was included in the base system. > > CVS != csup. > > I wonder how many people will express their sentiments about CVS when > they really mean cvsup/csup. > > Max I use CVS I've used sup, (maybe csup can't rememeber, not used cvsup really) I avoid reliance on a net connection just to do a checkout. I use ctm to [push] feed my local CVS tree. ctm deltas of cvs src & ports are generated [by cvsup, pulling from freebsd.org] elsewhere, ctm-users@freebsd.org led by Stephen M recently included: Subject: ctm for svn Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201112111430.pBBEUoBc064463>