Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Sep 1997 22:30:35 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        hcremean@vt.edu
Cc:        tlambert@primenet.com, chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Do you have some neat configuration files?
Message-ID:  <199709082230.PAA15359@usr09.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <19970908180219.40521@wakky.dyn.ml.org> from "Lee Cremeans" at Sep 8, 97 06:02:19 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> > [ ... ]
> > 
> > > Any other suggestions?
> > 
> > fvwm95.
> > 
> > Graphical logins.
> > 
> > Other Windows95-type crap.
> 
> WAH, NO, ANYTHING but that! :) :) :)

I think his goals could be stated as:

"Better a Win95 user with a FreeBSD engine than a Win95 user with a
Win95 engine."

If so, having a "Win95 mask" for FreeBSD is the best way to achieve
those goals.

No one said it would be the default (but of course, if it was, a
power user could change it, and the target "market" would have a
hard time putting the mask on an unmasked system, so maybe it should
be the default, if only the defualt install option selection).


					Regards,
					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709082230.PAA15359>