Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 19:00:27 -0500 From: Ultima <ultima1252@gmail.com> To: Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Significant performance hit on recent upgrade Message-ID: <CANJ8om5dyyXc-_rDNqMX1PARGgsEEQyQV6hwVuUmoPTisB9%2B_Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CANJ8om4FoUHwn%2BCpRbWSDFgjZJdunQxMd2UGC65q1XArFLCMJw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CANJ8om7SbJZrSVCoEmuF5tP_u9QLF0GbHNFKzuGJmnNvT5_fng@mail.gmail.com> <56E359ED.1090106@freebsd.org> <CANJ8om4FoUHwn%2BCpRbWSDFgjZJdunQxMd2UGC65q1XArFLCMJw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Should I restart and provide this info after 20min into build? Or is this good info? On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ultima <ultima1252@gmail.com> wrote: > last pid: 96327; load averages: 41.78, 50.32, 50.07 up 1+05:19:23 > 18:52:47 > 169 processes: 11 running, 158 sleeping > CPU: 24.4% user, 0.2% nice, 15.1% system, 0.1% interrupt, 60.3% idle > Mem: 12G Active, 43G Inact, 186G Wired, 8867M Free > ARC: 166G Total, 122G MFU, 38G MRU, 46M Anon, 753M Header, 5314M Other > Swap: > > > This is currently with poudriere que of 4000ish packages, right now at > only 116 pkg per hour with 12 jails. Has been going for around 11 hours > now. Usually it would be done by now with around 350ish pkg per hour with > other jail versions running, only running the one right now. > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> On 03/11/2016 18:49, Ultima wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > Recently I upgraded to r296377, and notice a big hit in performance. >> This >> > system in question is a poudriere building system that usually has many >> > jails running building around 200-400 pkg per hour for each jail. After >> the >> > upgrade, it is rare to see over 100 pkg per hour built. Possible >> regression >> > on recent commit? >> > >> > Previously was running (sorry had git src at the time) 8b372d1(master) >> > built around a week ago. Any ideas what maybe causing this? I can >> provide >> > more details if needed, someone in irc also mentioned noticing a hit in >> > performance. >> > >> > >> > Ultima >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> >> Are you using ZFS? What does your memory utilization look like? >> Can you provide the 'Mem' and 'ARC' lines from top(1) while building >> packages (ideally, a good 20+ minutes into such a build)? >> >> -- >> Allan Jude >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org >> " >> > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANJ8om5dyyXc-_rDNqMX1PARGgsEEQyQV6hwVuUmoPTisB9%2B_Q>