Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 18:37:48 +0100 From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org>, Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, brian@hak.lan.awfulhak.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern uipc_socket.c uipc_socket2.c src/sys/sys socket.h Message-ID: <200006161737.SAA00670@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> of "Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:42:11 EDT." <200006161442.KAA17805@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> <<On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:13:41 -0400, Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> said:
>
> > If natd had been written in the kernel (which no-one would have objected
> > to), you would have the exact above scenario.
>
> I would have, strenuously.
Is there a big difference between natd and ipnat ? Or do you object
to ipnat ?
> -GAWollman
--
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org> <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org>; <brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006161737.SAA00670>