Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 12:30:24 -0800 (PST) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@hub.freebsd.org> To: tlambert@primenet.com Cc: ragnar@sysabend.org, brett@lariat.org, dscheidt@enteract.com, tlambert@primenet.com, noslenj@swbell.net, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dual 400 -> dual 600 worth it? Message-ID: <19991214203024.E1BBC14CC3@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <199912141935.MAA21198@usr02.primenet.com> (message from Terry Lambert on Tue, 14 Dec 1999 19:35:35 %2B0000 (GMT))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Now if only IKE/ISAKMP weren't based on clipper chip technology... > > > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org ???? certain chip vendors chips may be based upon or include clipper chip (do you know of any?). IKE/ISAKMP is not based upon clipper. the leaf fields, the key escrow and all the rest of it are not part of IKE/ISAKMP. this statemtne is based upon reading the RFC's, IPSec by naganamd doraswamy and dan harkins. surely you are not suggesting that KAME has implemented a software version of clipper chip technology in their code. jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991214203024.E1BBC14CC3>