Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 07:52:13 +0100 From: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steveo@eircom.net> To: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> Cc: n@nectar.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /etc/shells #include syntax support patch Message-ID: <20010129075213.75982219.steveo@eircom.net> In-Reply-To: <200101290453.f0T4roq13148@whizzo.transsys.com> References: <20010128101349.2c94539f.steveo@eircom.net> <20010128190227.B25222@spawn.nectar.com> <200101290453.f0T4roq13148@whizzo.transsys.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:53:50 -0500 "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> wrote: LM> It doesn't seem unreasonable to have a single file with a list of allowable LM> shells. One thing - it is kind of cute having the allowable shells match the mounted shells. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010129075213.75982219.steveo>