Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:54:31 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, adrian@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r211503 - head/sys/mips/atheros Message-ID: <4C6D6FD7.7060106@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100819.112040.914206331691540228.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <201008191153.o7JBrtbl002979@svn.freebsd.org> <4C6D2933.9020306@freebsd.org> <20100819.112040.914206331691540228.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19.08.2010 19:20, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message:<4C6D2933.9020306@freebsd.org> > Andre Oppermann<andre@freebsd.org> writes: > : On 19.08.2010 13:53, Adrian Chadd wrote: > :> Author: adrian > :> Date: Thu Aug 19 11:53:55 2010 > :> New Revision: 211503 > :> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211503 > :> > :> Log: > :> Add some initial AR724X chipset support. > :> > :> This is untested but should at least allow an AR724X to boot. > : > : Isn't this something that should be done on a project branch and > : merged back when in a good working state? > > We don't have a branch for mips stuff these days. This stuff is OK, > since the AR724X is just being rolled out right now... For non AR724x > systems, this won't affect anything... I was more concerned about tree breakage for non-tested code. When developing something bleeding edge it is often useful to just commit some stuff and have it sorted out later. In head this is more dangerous. A small AR724X development branch would be ideal for this. Branching is cheap with SVN these days. -- Andre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C6D6FD7.7060106>