Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 18:27:10 +0100 (MET) From: "Georg-W. Koltermann" <gwk@racer.dkrz.de> To: darrenr@cyber.com.au Cc: ulf@pbinet.com, coredump@nervosa.com, darrenr@cyber.com.au, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ide problems Message-ID: <199602211727.SAA13655@racer.dkrz.de> In-Reply-To: <199602201629.DAA00933@plum.cyber.com.au> (message from Darren Reed on Wed, 21 Feb 1996 03:29:33 %2B1100 (EST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Darren Reed <darrenr@cyber.com.au> > Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 03:29:33 +1100 (EST) > Cc: coredump@nervosa.com, darrenr@cyber.com.au, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG > X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] > Content-Type: text > Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG > Precedence: bulk > > > > > wd0: interrupt timeout: > > > > wd0: status 58<seekdone,drq> error 0 > > > > wd0: interrupt timeout: > > > > wd0: status 50<seekdone> error 1<no_dam> > > > > > > > > 2.1.0-RELEASE/Pentium-100 > > This seems to be dependant on some option I've defined for the kernel. > > I suspect "AUTO_EOI_1" and/or "AUTO_EOI_2". > > I've currently got a working kernel (no errors). > > If anyone would like to examine two config files - one which doesn't > result in the above and one which does - let me know. > > darren > I have AUTO_EOI_1, but *not* AUTO_EOI_2 in my kernel. My system is a 386DX/40, 8MB RAM, no 80387, two IDE drives, wd ethernet, et4000 (ISA) VGA adapter. FreeBSD 2.1.0-RELEASE. To repeat: I see the interrupt timeout just occasionally, and it doesn't bother me. Regards, Georg-W. Koltermann, gwk@cray.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602211727.SAA13655>