Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:31:34 +0300 (MSK) From: Igor Sysoev <is@rambler-co.ru> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: getsysfd() patch #1 (Re: Virtual memory question) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0301142230540.30274-100000@is> In-Reply-To: <3E23F51D.4AD21462@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > Matthew Dillon wrote: > > When I'm talking about timers, I mean the real deal. Not the pipsqueak > > little timers implemented by kqueue. > > You mean implemented as the timeout parameter in kqueue; there's > no reason that the kqueue can't be used as the event communication > mechanism for itimers (for example). I believe that supporting > one-shots would be within the realm of the standard, in terms of > implementation defined flags on itimers... I think Matt means not kqueue timeout parameter but EVFILT_TIMER filter that has millisecond resolution and allows periodic (by default) or oneshot (with EV_ONESHOT flag) timers. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0301142230540.30274-100000>