Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:28:58 +0300 From: "Penerdzhy R.V." <prv0@yandex.ru> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 101, Issue 9 Message-ID: <1914821434.20050303142858@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050303112003.1AD5E16A4DA@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050303112003.1AD5E16A4DA@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Здравствуйте, freebsd-stable-request. Вы писали 3 марта 2005 г., 14:20:03: fsrfo> Send freebsd-stable mailing list submissions to fsrfo> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit fsrfo> fsrfo> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable fsrfo> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fsrfo> freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org fsrfo> You can reach the person managing the list at fsrfo> freebsd-stable-owner@freebsd.org fsrfo> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific fsrfo> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-stable digest..." fsrfo> Today's Topics: fsrfo> 1. Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 101, Issue 8 (Penerdzhy R.V.) fsrfo> 2. Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo> FreebBSD 4.10 (Artem Kuchin) fsrfo> 3. Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo> FreebBSD 4.10 (Gerald de la Pascua) fsrfo> 4. Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo> FreebBSD 4.10 (Artem Kuchin) fsrfo> 5. 1000baseTX? (Yoshiaki Kasahara) fsrfo> 6. Linking with CUPS Issue (Jake Stride) fsrfo> 7. Re: Dual booting with Windows XP (Jared Earle) fsrfo> 8. Need Help With mount_smbfs Error Message (Tim Daneliuk) fsrfo> 9. Re: Linking with CUPS Issue (Michael C. Shultz) fsrfo> 10. 4.11-RELEASE panics (Kirill Ponomarew) fsrfo> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- fsrfo> Message: 1 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:16:35 +0300 fsrfo> From: "Penerdzhy R.V." <prv0@yandex.ru> fsrfo> Subject: Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 101, Issue 8 fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <1576425481.20050303111635@yandex.ru> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 fsrfo> Здравствуйте, freebsd-stable-request. fsrfo> Вы писали 3 марта 2005 г., 11:09:56: fsrfo>> Send freebsd-stable mailing list submissions to fsrfo>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit fsrfo>> fsrfo>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable fsrfo>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fsrfo>> freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org fsrfo>> You can reach the person managing the list at fsrfo>> freebsd-stable-owner@freebsd.org fsrfo>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific fsrfo>> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-stable digest..." fsrfo>> Today's Topics: fsrfo>> 1. Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for FreebBSD fsrfo>> 4.10 (Artem Kuchin) fsrfo>> 2. Re: Can FreeBSD be installed on fsrfo>> DellPowerEdge2800 ? (Art Mason) fsrfo>> 3. 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Thomas Krause) fsrfo>> 4. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Scot Hetzel) fsrfo>> 5. Re: "ioctl DIOCSMBR: Operation not permitted" from "boot0cfg fsrfo>> -s 1" (Doug Ambrisko) fsrfo>> 6. Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5 (M. Warner Losh) fsrfo>> 7. Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4 (M. Warner Losh) fsrfo>> 8. Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4 (M. Warner Losh) fsrfo>> 9. Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5 (Ruslan Ermilov) fsrfo>> 10. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Colin Percival) fsrfo>> 11. Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes fsrfo>> (Freddie Cash) fsrfo>> 12. ueagle(4) driver merging (Mateusz J?drasik) fsrfo>> 13. Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes fsrfo>> (Peter Jeremy) fsrfo>> 14. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Brian Behlendorf) fsrfo>> 15. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Kevin Oberman) fsrfo>> 16. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Kevin Oberman) fsrfo>> 17. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Daniel Eischen) fsrfo>> 18. Re: ueagle(4) driver merging (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo>> 19. Re: ueagle(4) driver merging (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo>> 20. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Brian Behlendorf) fsrfo>> 21. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Daniel Eischen) fsrfo>> 22. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Pete French) fsrfo>> 23. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Eric Schuele) fsrfo>> 24. Dual booting with Windows XP (Didier Caamano) fsrfo>> 25. 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) (Edwin Brown) fsrfo>> 26. Re: Crash when PREEMPTION enabled (Kris Kennaway) fsrfo>> 27. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>> (Michael C. Shultz) fsrfo>> 28. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>> (Edwin Brown) fsrfo>> 29. ndis problem with stable kernel source (Nicholas Basila) fsrfo>> 30. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>> (Edwin Brown) fsrfo>> 31. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>> (Michael C. Shultz) fsrfo>> 32. Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo>> FreebBSD 4.10 (pete wright) fsrfo>> 33. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo>> 34. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo>> 35. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Nicholas Basila) fsrfo>> 36. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (pcasidy@casidy.com) fsrfo>> 37. -PRErelease and ACPI: no PRT entry for 0.1.INTA (Emanuel Strobl) fsrfo>> 38. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo>> 39. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Nicholas Basila) fsrfo>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- fsrfo>> Message: 1 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300 fsrfo>> From: "Artem Kuchin" <matrix@itlegion.ru> fsrfo>> Subject: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for FreebBSD fsrfo>> 4.10 fsrfo>> To: "FreeBSD Stable" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo>> Message-ID: <024601c51f33$eda69e40$0c00a8c0@artem> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; fsrfo>> reply-type=original fsrfo>> Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2) fsrfo>> controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ? fsrfo>> It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB IDE fsrfo>> driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for sure). fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> Regards, fsrfo>> Artem Kuchin fsrfo>> IT Legion Ltd. fsrfo>> Moscow, Russia fsrfo>> www.itlegion.ru fsrfo>> matrix@itlegion.ru fsrfo>> +7 095 232-0338 fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 2 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:25:40 -0600 fsrfo>> From: Art Mason <amason@rackspace.com> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: Can FreeBSD be installed on DellPowerEdge2800 ? fsrfo>> To: Vinny Abello <vinny@tellurian.com> fsrfo>> Cc: Kipp Holger <h.kipp@eurowings.com> fsrfo>> Message-ID: <4225CCE4.3080304@rackspace.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo>> Yeah, I cam across that on some mailing list archives, but saw some fsrfo>> additional references that this can cause issues with the amr driver. fsrfo>> Have you experienced any instability issues with the amr driver and PAE fsrfo>> enabled? If not, then I'll give this a shot on one of our lab boxes for fsrfo>> testing. Thanks for the suggestion, BTW. fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> Art Mason fsrfo>> Technical Support - Team F fsrfo>> Rackspace Managed Hosting fsrfo>> (800) 961-4454 ext. 4290 fsrfo>> amason@rackspace.com fsrfo>> Vinny Abello wrote: >>> FYI, the architecture of the 2850 (assuming it is similar to your 2800) >>> requires that you enable PAE support in your kernel of whatever OS you >>> run to address the full 4GB of RAM. This is due in some part because of >>> the memory mapping that was done for the PCI express bus and/or onboard >>> Perc controller (per Dell tech support). We've run into this with all of >>> our 2850's with various OS's and enabling PAE (per Dell's advice) fixes it. >>> >>> At 05:50 PM 3/1/2005, Art Mason wrote: >>> >>>> Indeed, just installed on a customer's server last night, and I build >>>> SMP support into the GENERIC kernel this morning. Only issues I >>>> encountered has to do w/ recognizing the full 4GB of RAM, but this >>>> apparently has some compatibility issues w/ the amr driver. >>>> As per Holger's comments about disabling USB in BIOS, this is a good >>>> suggestion, since the DRAC apparently causes some IRQ issues w/ the >>>> PS/2 keyboard controller, or something along those lines. Regardless, >>>> these 2850 boxes are stupid fast, and I'm looking forward to >>>> benchmarking 5.3 on them. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Art Mason >>>> Technical Support - Team F >>>> Rackspace Managed Hosting >>>> (800) 961-4454 ext. 4290 >>>> amason@rackspace.com >>>> >>>> >>>> Kipp Holger wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue 01.03.2005 17:49, lhmwzy wrote: >>>>> Please reply to hk at alogis dot com. This is not my native >>>>> account. >>>>> >>>>>> Subject: Can FreeBSD be installed on DellPowerEdge2800 ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yes >>>>> >>>>>> Anybody did this? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yes. >>>>> >>>>>> Any help is appreciateed? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Boot from FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-CD and install. No problems >>>>> so far. You might want to disable USB within BIOS, though, >>>>> because they seem to be shared with other critical devices >>>>> (nics and raidcontroller). But I don't use USB anyway. >>>>> Then you might want to upgrade to 5-STABLE. >>>>> This is on Dell PowerEdge 2800 with 2GB ECC RAM, >>>>> 4 x 36GB SCSI and amrd-Controller (PERC-4-something). >>>>> Binary copy of SAP 4.6C and Oracle 8 (from a working >>>>> installation on FreeBSD 4.x) works nearly without changes >>>>> (using emulators/linux_base-suse-9.1 and one additional >>>>> rpm (some compatibility-thing)). >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Holger Kipp >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >>> >>> Vinny Abello >>> Network Engineer >>> Server Management >>> vinny@tellurian.com >>> (973)300-9211 x 125 >>> (973)940-6125 (Direct) >>> PGP Key Fingerprint: 3BC5 9A48 FC78 03D3 82E0 E935 5325 FBCB 0100 977A >>> >>> Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection >>> http://www.tellurian.com (888)TELLURIAN >>> >>> "Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear - not absence of fear" >>> -- Mark Twain >>> >>> >>> fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 3 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:07:04 +0100 (CET) fsrfo>> From: "Thomas Krause" <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> fsrfo>> Subject: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: fsrfo>> <2481.212.78.101.51.1109776024.squirrel@mta.webmatic.de> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 fsrfo>> Hello, fsrfo>> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: fsrfo>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp fsrfo>> root 407 0.0 0.7 2944 1752 ?? Ss 3:54PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd fsrfo>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift fsrfo>> root 417 0.0 0.7 2944 1776 ?? S 3:54PM 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/ntpd fsrfo>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift fsrfo>> gate:/ # ntpq ntpq>>> peers fsrfo>> No association ID's returned fsrfo>> After restarting, I've one daemon and all is running fine: fsrfo>> gate:/ # /etc/rc.d/ntpd restart fsrfo>> Stopping ntpd. fsrfo>> Starting ntpd. fsrfo>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp fsrfo>> root 566 0.0 0.7 2944 1784 ?? Ss 4:04PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd fsrfo>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift fsrfo>> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. fsrfo>> Kind regards, fsrfo>> Thomas. fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 4 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:53:59 -0600 fsrfo>> From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo>> To: Thomas Krause <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> fsrfo>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <790a9fff05030207536d59cb17@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:07:04 +0100 (CET), Thomas Krause fsrfo>> <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: >>> >>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp >>> root 407 0.0 0.7 2944 1752 ?? Ss 3:54PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd >>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >>> root 417 0.0 0.7 2944 1776 ?? S 3:54PM 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/ntpd >>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >>> >>> gate:/ # ntpq >>> ntpq> peers >>> No association ID's returned >>> >>> After restarting, I've one daemon and all is running fine: >>> >>> gate:/ # /etc/rc.d/ntpd restart >>> Stopping ntpd. >>> Starting ntpd. >>> >>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp >>> root 566 0.0 0.7 2944 1784 ?? Ss 4:04PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd >>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >>> >>> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. >>> fsrfo>> It could be that you have 2 scripts that are starting ntpd, check your fsrfo>> rc.d directories: fsrfo>> grep ntp /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* fsrfo>> Scot fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 5 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:09:22 -0800 (PST) fsrfo>> From: Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: "ioctl DIOCSMBR: Operation not permitted" from "boot0cfg fsrfo>> -s 1" fsrfo>> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> fsrfo>> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <200503021609.j22G9MN3041308@ambrisko.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>> David Wolfskill writes: fsrfo>> | freebeast(5.4-P)[1] sudo boot0cfg -s 1 -v ad0 fsrfo>> | Password: fsrfo>> | boot0cfg: /dev/ad0: ioctl DIOCSMBR: Operation not permitted fsrfo>> | freebeast(5.4-P)[2] fsrfo>> You might try: fsrfo>> sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16 fsrfo>> Doug A. fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 6 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:13:22 -0700 (MST) fsrfo>> From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5 fsrfo>> To: veldy@veldy.net fsrfo>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <20050302.091322.112684861.imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo>> In message: <421DE027.70204@veldy.net> fsrfo>> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> writes: fsrfo>> : Right away ... first thing! fsrfo>> : fsrfo>> : fsrfo>> -------------------------------------------------------------- : >>>>> Installing everything fsrfo>> : fsrfo>> -------------------------------------------------------------- fsrfo>> : cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install : ===>>> share/info fsrfo>> : install -o root -g wheel -m 444 dir-tmpl /usr/share/info/dir : ===>>> include fsrfo>> : creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh fsrfo>> : touch: not found fsrfo>> You have one of the canonical problems: fsrfo>> (1) Time skew between building machine and installing machine fsrfo>> (2) The path to the sources isn't exactly identical, in its canonical fsrfo>> form, between building machine and installing machine fsrfo>> (3) MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX is different between building and installing. fsrfo>> Warner fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 7 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:14:15 -0700 (MST) fsrfo>> From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4 fsrfo>> To: sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net fsrfo>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <20050302.091415.101560664.imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo>> In message: <20050224145622.GE261@cowbert.2y.net> fsrfo>> "Peter C. Lai" <sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net> writes: fsrfo>> : Is there a way to build kernel modules by fsrfo>> themselves without having to fsrfo>> : build the entire kernel? I am adding umass support to a 4.x machine but fsrfo>> : I don't want to build the entire kernel. I already have scbus, but I need fsrfo>> : da and of course, umass. fsrfo>> cd src/sys/modules/umass ; make all install clean fsrfo>> This assumes that the sources match what's on the system. fsrfo>> Warner fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 8 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:15:16 -0700 (MST) fsrfo>> From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4 fsrfo>> To: sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net fsrfo>> Cc: swhetzel@gmail.com fsrfo>> Message-ID: <20050302.091516.51358208.imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo>> In message: <20050224161305.GG261@cowbert.2y.net> fsrfo>> "Peter C. Lai" <sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net> writes: fsrfo>> : On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:59:01AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: : >>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:56:22 -0500, Peter C. Lai : >>> <sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net> wrote: : >>> > Is there a way to build kernel modules by themselves without having to : >>> > build the entire kernel? I am adding umass support to a 4.x machine but : >>> > I don't want to build the entire kernel. I already have scbus, but I need : >>> > da and of course, umass. : >>> > : >>> : >>> Yes you can build modules seperately from a kernel build : >>> : >>> cd /usr/src/sys/modules/umass : >>> make obj : >>> make : >>> make install : >>> : >>> Scot fsrfo>> : fsrfo>> : ok. what about da? i don't have that in my kernel, even though i have scbus. fsrfo>> : I think i'm just going to recompile the entire kernel anyway; I was just fsrfo>> : trying to not have to back-cvs /usr/src to patch the current one I have fsrfo>> : installed. (the more basic problem is i really should be keeping multiple fsrfo>> : versions of /usr/src around for different versions on different machines, fsrfo>> : but that is a separate problem). fsrfo>> modules/cam is what you want. Hmmm, looks like you have part of it in fsrfo>> your kernel already, so you'll not be able to do what you want. fsrfo>> Warner fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 9 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:56:45 +0200 fsrfo>> From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5 fsrfo>> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo>> Cc: veldy@veldy.net fsrfo>> Message-ID: <20050302165645.GB49216@ip.net.ua> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" fsrfo>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 09:13:22AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: >>> In message: <421DE027.70204@veldy.net> >>> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> writes: >>> : Right away ... first thing! >>> : >>> : -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> : >>> Installing everything >>> : -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> : cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install >>> : ===> share/info >>> : install -o root -g wheel -m 444 dir-tmpl /usr/share/info/dir >>> : ===> include >>> : creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh >>> : touch: not found >>> >>> You have one of the canonical problems: >>> >>> (1) Time skew between building machine and installing machine >>> (2) The path to the sources isn't exactly identical, in its canonical >>> form, between building machine and installing machine >>> (3) MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX is different between building and installing. >>> fsrfo>> Besides, for NFS installs (by mounting /usr/src and /usr/obj and doing fsrfo>> install) to work at all, the following conditions all must be met: fsrfo>> 1) Architecture on both machines should be the same, fsrfo>> 2) CPUs on both machines should be compatible [*], fsrfo>> 3) FreeBSD versions should be IDENTICAL, fsrfo>> 4) The contents of /etc/make.conf should be compatible. fsrfo>> [*] Or the world on the build machine should be built with CFLAGS fsrfo>> compatible with the CPU on the install machine. fsrfo>> Cheers, fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> Ruslan Ermilov fsrfo>> ru@FreeBSD.org fsrfo>> FreeBSD committer fsrfo>> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo>> Name: not available fsrfo>> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo>> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo>> Desc: not available fsrfo>> Url : fsrfo>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050302/434f456b/attachment-0001.bin fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 10 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:15:18 +0000 fsrfo>> From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo>> To: Thomas Krause <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> fsrfo>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <4225F4A6.8010200@freebsd.org> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 fsrfo>> Thomas Krause wrote: >>> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: >>> [...] >>> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. fsrfo>> 1. You have some host names in ntp.conf which need to be resolved, and fsrfo>> 2. At the time ntpd starts, the resolver isn't running. fsrfo>> For some reason, ntpd makes one attempt to look up names in DNS and then fsrfo>> goes into an infinite loop. fsrfo>> Colin Percival fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 11 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:20:42 -0800 fsrfo>> From: Freddie Cash <fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <200503020920.43155.fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" fsrfo>> On March 2, 2005 02:46 am, Rob wrote: >>> In /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES is the list of supported >>> sound devices. I get confused by the pressence and >>> absence of quotes here. Are these quotes only >>> decoration, or really needed. For example: >>> device "snd_ad1816" >>> device snd_cmi >>> If they are needed, it confuses me why one sound >>> device needs quotes, and another doesn't? fsrfo>> You have to put quotes around any device names with numbers in them. If fsrfo>> you don't, the kernel config will error out. >>> How does that affect the use of loading them in >>> /boot/loader.conf? How about following two: fsrfo>> It doesn't affect loader.conf. You only put quotes around the value of fsrfo>> the variable ("YES" or "NO") not around the variable names. >>> snd_ad1816_load="YES" >>> snd_cmi_load="YES" >>> Is that OK? fsrfo>> Yes. fsrfo>> However, if you add the devices to the kernel config file, you don't fsrfo>> need to add them to loader.conf. loader.conf is used to load kernel fsrfo>> modules. You need to decide whether to compile all devices into the fsrfo>> kernel, or load some as kernel modules. fsrfo>> Personally, I like to put devices that won't change (like USB, ATA, SMB, fsrfo>> etc) into the kernel config file. And load devices that will change fsrfo>> (like NICs, soundcards, etc) as modules via loader.conf. Saves time fsrfo>> and effort when I decide to swap out NICs and test soundcards and fsrfo>> similar. fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> Freddie Cash, CCNT CCLP Helpdesk / Network Support Tech. fsrfo>> School District 73 (250) 377-HELP [377-4357] fsrfo>> fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 12 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:55:23 +0100 fsrfo>> From: Mateusz J?drasik<imachine@toya.net.pl> fsrfo>> Subject: ueagle(4) driver merging fsrfo>> To: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <4225FE0B.1000604@toya.net.pl> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed fsrfo>> Hi, fsrfo>> I wonder how is the FreeBSD team looking on the driver ueagle written by fsrfo>> one Damien Bergamini. It is a ADSL modem driver which connects using fsrfo>> USB, a quite popular solution in Poland, and France as well, aparently. fsrfo>> Is the idea of FreeBSD to merge such driver as a hack to the umodem fsrfo>> code, or to stay in tune with Damien's solution and merge the whole driver? fsrfo>> I would really like to see such a driver supported inside of the FreeBSD fsrfo>> system itself since it would make me feel much more comfortable using a fsrfo>> somewhat FreeBSD oficially supported code than third party patching. fsrfo>> Here follows some more information regarding the project: fsrfo>> http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ueagle/index.html fsrfo>> Cheers, fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> Mateusz Jкdrasik <imachine@toya.net.pl> fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 13 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 05:51:36 +1100 fsrfo>> From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes fsrfo>> To: Rob <spamrefuse@yahoo.com> fsrfo>> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo>> Message-ID: <20050302185136.GA2302@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo>> On Wed, 2005-Mar-02 02:46:41 -0800, Rob wrote: >>>In /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES is the list of supported >>>sound devices. I get confused by the pressence and >>>absence of quotes here. Are these quotes only >>>decoration, or really needed. For example: >>> >>>device "snd_ad1816" >>>device snd_cmi >>> >>>If they are needed, it confuses me why one sound >>>device needs quotes, and another doesn't? fsrfo>> For hysterical raisins, config(8) parses bareword arguments to "device" as fsrfo>> <perl> fsrfo>> ($device_name, $device_instance) = /([a-zA-Z_]+)([0-9]*)/; fsrfo>> </perl> fsrfo>> The double quotes force the first entry to be treated as a device fsrfo>> "snd_ad1816", rather than the 1817th instance of "snd_ad". >>>How does that affect the use of loading them in >>>/boot/loader.conf? How about following two: >>> >>>snd_ad1816_load="YES" >>>snd_cmi_load="YES" >>> >>>Is that OK? fsrfo>> Yes. The loader has a different parsing algorithm: fsrfo>> ${device_name}_load="{YES,NO}" fsrfo>> and fsrfo>> hint.$device_name.$device_instance.flag="VALUE" fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> Peter Jeremy fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 14 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:06:27 -0800 (PST) fsrfo>> From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@collab.net> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo>> To: Ruben van Staveren <ruben@verweg.com> fsrfo>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <20050302150553.N84651@paz.hyperreal.org> fsrfo>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed fsrfo>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:23:42AM +0200, Ege Mukan wrote: >>> >>>> Nowavadays whenever I want to surf on websites which contains flash >>>> things my firefox or mozilla shuts itself. >>>> >>>> Did you ever encounter this problem. And if you'd how did you eliminate ??? >>> >>> Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ? >>> >>> (as in >>> >>> Section "Extensions" >>> Option "Composite" "Enable" >>> EndSection >>> >>> ) >>> >>> Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! /bin/sh >>> >>> export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1 fsrfo>> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and fsrfo>> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12. fsrfo>> Brian fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 15 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:07:55 -0800 fsrfo>> From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo>> To: "Thomas Krause" <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> fsrfo>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <20050302230755.7A0F05D07@ptavv.es.net> >>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:07:04 +0100 (CET) >>> From: "Thomas Krause" <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> >>> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >>> >>> Hello, >>> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: >>> >>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp >>> root 407 0.0 0.7 2944 1752 ?? Ss 3:54PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd >>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >>> root 417 0.0 0.7 2944 1776 ?? S 3:54PM 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/ntpd >>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >>> >>> gate:/ # ntpq >>> ntpq> peers >>> No association ID's returned >>> >>> After restarting, I've one daemon and all is running fine: >>> >>> gate:/ # /etc/rc.d/ntpd restart >>> Stopping ntpd. >>> Starting ntpd. >>> >>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp >>> root 566 0.0 0.7 2944 1784 ?? Ss 4:04PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd >>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >>> >>> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. fsrfo>> Either you have two commands to start ntpd in /etc/rc.d or (more likely) fsrfo>> the parent process is never exiting. When ntpd starts, it forks a child fsrfo>> process (the daemon) and exits. I have seen cases where the parent fsrfo>> process never exits because the child never properly starts. fsrfo>> That said, I have never seen this happen on a FreeBSD system, so it may fsrfo>> be that you are starting it twice. But this seems a bit unlikely as the fsrfo>> second daemon should exit immediately because the network socket is fsrfo>> already in use. But it's possible that they are stating so close fsrfo>> together that a race condition is locking things up. (Just speculation.) fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer fsrfo>> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) fsrfo>> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) fsrfo>> E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 16 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:11:23 -0800 fsrfo>> From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo>> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> fsrfo>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <20050302231123.D14555D07@ptavv.es.net> >>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:15:18 +0000 >>> From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> >>> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >>> >>> Thomas Krause wrote: >>> > when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: >>> > [...] >>> > Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. >>> >>> 1. You have some host names in ntp.conf which need to be resolved, and >>> 2. At the time ntpd starts, the resolver isn't running. >>> >>> For some reason, ntpd makes one attempt to look up names in DNS and then >>> goes into an infinite loop. fsrfo>> Good idea. Yes, the DNS resolution in ntpd is really, really stupid. I fsrfo>> always specify addresses in ntp.conf for this reason and the fact that fsrfo>> it there are multiple addresses only the first returned will be fsrfo>> tried. It never fails over if that one is dead. (And, should an IPv6 fsrfo>> address be available on a system that does not have IPv6 fsrfo>> connectivity...). fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer fsrfo>> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) fsrfo>> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) fsrfo>> E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 17 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:56:36 -0500 (EST) fsrfo>> From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo>> To: Brian Behlendorf <brian@collab.net> fsrfo>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: fsrfo>> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0503021855350.28715-100000@sea.ntplx.net> fsrfo>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote: >>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote: >>> > >>> > Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ? >>> > >>> > (as in >>> > >>> > Section "Extensions" >>> > Option "Composite" "Enable" >>> > EndSection >>> > >>> > ) >>> > >>> > Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! /bin/sh >>> > >>> > export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1 >>> >>> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and >>> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12. fsrfo>> Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace fsrfo>> out of it? fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> DE fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 18 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:43:43 +1030 fsrfo>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: ueagle(4) driver merging fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <200503031043.52675.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" fsrfo>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 04:25, Mateusz Jкdrasik wrote: >>> Is the idea of FreeBSD to merge such driver as a hack to the umodem >>> code, or to stay in tune with Damien's solution and merge the whole driver? fsrfo>> umodem is for serial modems not ADSL. I believe ADSL modems tend to send fsrfo>> either ATM or ethernet frames whereas umodem deals with RS232 like devices. fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer fsrfo>> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au fsrfo>> "The nice thing about standards is that there fsrfo>> are so many of them to choose from." fsrfo>> -- Andrew Tanenbaum fsrfo>> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C fsrfo>> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo>> Name: not available fsrfo>> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo>> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo>> Desc: not available fsrfo>> Url : fsrfo>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/abd25763/attachment-0002.bin fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 19 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:43:43 +1030 fsrfo>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: ueagle(4) driver merging fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <200503031043.52675.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" fsrfo>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 04:25, Mateusz Jкdrasik wrote: >>> Is the idea of FreeBSD to merge such driver as a hack to the umodem >>> code, or to stay in tune with Damien's solution and merge the whole driver? fsrfo>> umodem is for serial modems not ADSL. I believe ADSL modems tend to send fsrfo>> either ATM or ethernet frames whereas umodem deals with RS232 like devices. fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer fsrfo>> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au fsrfo>> "The nice thing about standards is that there fsrfo>> are so many of them to choose from." fsrfo>> -- Andrew Tanenbaum fsrfo>> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C fsrfo>> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo>> Name: not available fsrfo>> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo>> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo>> Desc: not available fsrfo>> Url : fsrfo>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/abd25763/attachment-0003.bin fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 20 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:16:22 -0800 (PST) fsrfo>> From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@hyperreal.org> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <20050302161410.X84651@paz.hyperreal.org> fsrfo>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed fsrfo>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote: >>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ? >>>>> >>>>> (as in >>>>> >>>>> Section "Extensions" >>>>> Option "Composite" "Enable" >>>>> EndSection >>>>> >>>>> ) >>>>> >>>>> Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! /bin/sh >>>>> >>>>> export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1 >>>> >>>> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and >>>> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12. >>> >>> Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace >>> out of it? fsrfo>> Because, as I said earlier this thread: fsrfo>> I do try it every couple of weeks to see if it works, but the best it fsrfo>> gets is two-three web sites and then the seg fault. I realize until I fsrfo>> sit down with a stack trace I haven't earned the right to complain, so I fsrfo>> haven't yet, figuring it'll be important enough someday to someone fsrfo>> clueful enough. Or, Macromedia will some day lighten up and let Mozilla fsrfo>> include it as part of the web browser by default. Or something. fsrfo>> ...and that I've got nowhere near the chops to do anything useful with a fsrfo>> stack trace that I'm sure others do. I thought I'd pipe up in response to fsrfo>> Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom fsrfo>> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work? fsrfo>> Brian fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 21 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 19:31:36 -0500 (EST) fsrfo>> From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo>> To: Brian Behlendorf <brian@hyperreal.org> fsrfo>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: fsrfo>> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0503021926300.28715-100000@sea.ntplx.net> fsrfo>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote: >>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote: >>> > >>> > Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace >>> > out of it? >>> >>> Because, as I said earlier this thread: >>> >>> I do try it every couple of weeks to see if it works, but the best it >>> gets is two-three web sites and then the seg fault. I realize until I >>> sit down with a stack trace I haven't earned the right to complain, so I >>> haven't yet, figuring it'll be important enough someday to someone >>> clueful enough. Or, Macromedia will some day lighten up and let Mozilla >>> include it as part of the web browser by default. Or something. >>> >>> ...and that I've got nowhere near the chops to do anything useful with a >>> stack trace that I'm sure others do. I thought I'd pipe up in response to >>> Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom >>> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work? fsrfo>> Is it that hard to type 'firefox -g', alias firefox="firefox -g", or fsrfo>> whatever, and use it that way for a few days to see if you can fsrfo>> get a trace? I'm just wondering if it has the same problem fsrfo>> as linuxpluginwrapper, or bad assumptions about mutexes fsrfo>> being recursive or unlocking one you don't own. fsrfo>> Most folks I know use the linuxpluginwrapper so we don't have fsrfo>> any experience with the native flash player. I think I recall fsrfo>> trying it and it not working, hence the use of linuxpluginwrapper. fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> DE fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 22 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:54:23 +0000 fsrfo>> From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo>> To: brian@hyperreal.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <E1D6ebf-000Dcm-Ut@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk> >>> Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom >>> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work? fsrfo>> No, it doesnt work for me either - but I dont care enough about fsrfo>> websites with mflash to bother looking into it. fsrfo>> -pcf. fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 23 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 22:22:58 -0600 fsrfo>> From: Eric Schuele <e.schuele@computer.org> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo>> To: Brian Behlendorf <brian@hyperreal.org> fsrfo>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <42269122.7000505@computer.org> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo>> Brian Behlendorf wrote: >>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ? >>>>>> >>>>>> (as in >>>>>> >>>>>> Section "Extensions" >>>>>> Option "Composite" "Enable" >>>>>> EndSection >>>>>> >>>>>> ) >>>>>> >>>>>> Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! >>>>>> /bin/sh >>>>>> >>>>>> export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and >>>>> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12. >>>> >>>> >>>> Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace >>>> out of it? >>> >>> >>> Because, as I said earlier this thread: >>> >>> I do try it every couple of weeks to see if it works, but the best it >>> gets is two-three web sites and then the seg fault. I realize until I >>> sit down with a stack trace I haven't earned the right to complain, so I >>> haven't yet, figuring it'll be important enough someday to someone >>> clueful enough. Or, Macromedia will some day lighten up and let Mozilla >>> include it as part of the web browser by default. Or something. >>> >>> ...and that I've got nowhere near the chops to do anything useful with a >>> stack trace that I'm sure others do. I thought I'd pipe up in response >>> to Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom >>> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work? >>> fsrfo>> Fails for me too. On all flash sites near as I can tell. fsrfo>> -Eric >>> Brian >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> Regards, fsrfo>> Eric fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 24 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:40:28 -0700 fsrfo>> From: Didier Caamano <nemesisdivina@gennux.ca> fsrfo>> Subject: Dual booting with Windows XP fsrfo>> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo>> Message-ID: <4226953C.7080107@gennux.ca> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo>> Hello everyone: fsrfo>> This might sound rather foolish, but I need some assistance on how to fsrfo>> dual boot FBSD 5.3 with WinXP. fsrfo>> I have to Hard Drives, Windows is in the first drive, and I want to fsrfo>> install FBSD on the second. No in the installation process I choose to fsrfo>> create the partitions to the second Hard Drive, then it ask me if I want fsrfo>> to install the boot manager, to which I answer yes, then it ask me where fsrfo>> to install it, and I choose to the First Hard drive, is that ok? well, fsrfo>> what happens is that after I choose the installer send me to disklabel fsrfo>> to slice the Hard drive, but it show the First hard drive. fsrfo>> am I making any sense at all? I thought that fsrfo>> installing the boot manager fsrfo>> was going to be a straigh forward process, is there anything wrong with fsrfo>> what I am experiencing? Any help will be appreciated. fsrfo>> Good night everyone fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 25 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:48:19 -0500 fsrfo>> From: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown@gmail.com> fsrfo>> Subject: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <8b6eae960503022048b90c457@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>> I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in make.conf fsrfo>> CPUTYPE=i686 fsrfo>> CFLAGS=-02 -pipe fsrfo>> It was built on a p4. fsrfo>> I went to install this on my trusty firewall machine and I get the following fsrfo>> error: fsrfo>> -----BEGIN ERROR----- fsrfo>> CD Loader 1.2 fsrfo>> Building the boot loader arguments fsrfo>> Looking up /BOOT/LOADER... Found fsrfo>> Relocating the loader and the BTX fsrfo>> Starting the BTX loader fsrfo>> BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 fsrfo>> int=0000000d err=000000c0 efl=00010a47 eip=00015528 fsrfo>> eax=00000000 ebx=00000001 ecx=ffffffff edx=00094fa0 fsrfo>> esi=01164e7f edi=c8b66ff7 ebp=00093ff8 esp=7c24ddf4 fsrfo>> cs=002b ds=0033 es=0033 fs=0033 gs=0033 ss=0033 fsrfo>> cs:eip=9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00 fsrfo>> 9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00 fsrfo>> ss:esp=ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff fsrfo>> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff fsrfo>> BTX halted fsrfo>> -----END ERROR----- fsrfo>> Also, the 5.3.isos downloaded from ftp.freebsd.org fail to boot as well. fsrfo>> It's not hardware related as I'm able to pop in a OpenBSD3.6 snapshot fsrfo>> and boot from that. fsrfo>> Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm going to try the floppies next. fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 26 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:56:57 -0800 fsrfo>> From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: Crash when PREEMPTION enabled fsrfo>> To: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> fsrfo>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <20050303045657.GA6139@xor.obsecurity.org> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" fsrfo>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 07:13:04PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: >>> I have tried enabling PREEMPTION on 5.3-RELEASE-p5 whilst it ran OK >>> for a few hours, it crashed overnight whilst doing a "make index" in >>> /usr/ports. I've tried repeating "make index" and it worked. I have >>> a coredump of the crash and have been doing some poking around. fsrfo>> I've just turned on PREEMPTION on the 12-CPU sparc64 machine running fsrfo>> RELENG_5 that I've been playing with, and it quickly resets and fsrfo>> reboots under load (buildworld -j12). This happens with either ULE or fsrfo>> 4BSD, although ULE without PREEMPTION seems to work fine (and perform fsrfo>> much better than 4BSD, as expected). fsrfo>> It looks like PREEMPTION is indeed still broken in RELENG_5 - I guess fsrfo>> my workloads aren't enough to trigger this on other machines :-( fsrfo>> Kris fsrfo>> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo>> Name: not available fsrfo>> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo>> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo>> Desc: not available fsrfo>> Url : fsrfo>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050302/d783fa82/attachment-0001.bin fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 27 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:00:22 -0800 fsrfo>> From: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <200503022100.28784.reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 fsrfo>> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 08:48 pm, Edwin Brown wrote: >>> I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in >>> make.conf >>> >>> CPUTYPE=i686 >>> CFLAGS=-02 -pipe >>> >>> It was built on a p4. fsrfo>> CFLAGS should be -O2 not -02 and you really may want to concider just -O fsrfo>> -Mike fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 28 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:09:11 -0500 fsrfo>> From: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown@gmail.com> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>> To: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <8b6eae960503022109d8561e2@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>> I didn't cut and paste that. I had to copy everything by hand. It's fsrfo>> correct in the make.conf. fsrfo>> Best, fsrfo>> Edwin fsrfo>> On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:00:22 -0800, Michael C. Shultz fsrfo>> <reso3w83@verizon.net> wrote: >>> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 08:48 pm, Edwin Brown wrote: >>> > I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in >>> > make.conf >>> > >>> > CPUTYPE=i686 >>> > CFLAGS=-02 -pipe >>> > >>> > It was built on a p4. >>> >>> CFLAGS should be -O2 not -02 and you really may want to concider just -O >>> >>> -Mike >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 29 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:15:28 -0500 fsrfo>> From: Nicholas Basila <mlists@northglobe.com> fsrfo>> Subject: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo>> To: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <42269D70.5090806@northglobe.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo>> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm fsrfo>> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on fsrfo>> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried fsrfo>> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my fsrfo>> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this fsrfo>> failure is after the make depend... during the make): fsrfo>> linking kernel fsrfo>> if_ndis_pccard.o(.text+0xc): In function `ndis_probe_pccard': fsrfo>> : undefined reference to `drv_data' fsrfo>> if_ndis_pci.o(.text+0x14): In function `ndis_probe_pci': fsrfo>> : undefined reference to `drv_data' fsrfo>> *** Error code 1 fsrfo>> Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/HP09. fsrfo>> This card worked fine with 5.3-RELEASE. It's a Broadcom 54G wireless NIC fsrfo>> on an HP zd7140us notebook. Any thoughts? fsrfo>> Regards, fsrfo>> Nicholas fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 30 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:15:03 -0500 fsrfo>> From: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown@gmail.com> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <8b6eae960503022115363d3fde@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>> It boots OK from the floppies as a work around... fsrfo>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:48:19 -0500, Edwin Brown fsrfo>> <edwin.brown@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in make.conf >>> >>> CPUTYPE=i686 >>> CFLAGS=-02 -pipe >>> >>> It was built on a p4. >>> >>> I went to install this on my trusty firewall machine and I get the following >>> error: >>> -----BEGIN ERROR----- >>> CD Loader 1.2 >>> >>> Building the boot loader arguments >>> Looking up /BOOT/LOADER... Found >>> Relocating the loader and the BTX >>> Starting the BTX loader >>> >>> BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 >>> >>> int=0000000d err=000000c0 efl=00010a47 eip=00015528 >>> eax=00000000 ebx=00000001 ecx=ffffffff edx=00094fa0 >>> esi=01164e7f edi=c8b66ff7 ebp=00093ff8 esp=7c24ddf4 >>> cs=002b ds=0033 es=0033 fs=0033 gs=0033 ss=0033 >>> cs:eip=9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00 >>> 9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00 >>> ss:esp=ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >>> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >>> BTX halted >>> -----END ERROR----- >>> Also, the 5.3.isos downloaded from ftp.freebsd.org fail to boot as well. >>> >>> It's not hardware related as I'm able to pop in a OpenBSD3.6 snapshot >>> and boot from that. >>> >>> Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm going to try the floppies next. >>> fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 31 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:25:30 -0800 fsrfo>> From: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo>> To: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <200503022125.31189.reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 fsrfo>> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 09:09 pm, Edwin Brown wrote: >>> I didn't cut and paste that. I had to copy everything by hand. It's >>> correct in the make.conf. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Edwin >>> fsrfo>> OK, did you try just using -O? There is a note about that in the fsrfo>> make.conf file. fsrfo>> -Mike fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 32 fsrfo>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:50:41 -0800 fsrfo>> From: pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo>> FreebBSD 4.10 fsrfo>> To: Artem Kuchin <matrix@itlegion.ru> fsrfo>> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo>> Message-ID: <57d7100005030221505d8ff1b2@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300, Artem Kuchin fsrfo>> <matrix@itlegion.ru> wrote: >>> Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2) >>> controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ? >>> >>> It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB IDE >>> driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for sure). fsrfo>> sorry I don't know of any really cheap one's off hand, altho I do have fsrfo>> experience with 3Ware RAID cards on 4.x. They seemed to work well, fsrfo>> and they are less expensive than proper SCSI cards...altho slower. If fsrfo>> cost really an issue would it be worth mirroring your disks in fsrfo>> software via VINUM? fsrfo>> -p fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> ~~o0OO0o~~ fsrfo>> Pete Wright fsrfo>> www.nycbug.org fsrfo>> NYC's *BSD User Group fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 33 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:42:33 +1030 fsrfo>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <200503031642.39981.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" fsrfo>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:45, Nicholas Basila wrote: >>> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm >>> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on >>> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried >>> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my >>> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this >>> failure is after the make depend... during the make): fsrfo>> How did you run ndiscvt? Where did you get the driver from? fsrfo>> etc.. fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer fsrfo>> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au fsrfo>> "The nice thing about standards is that there fsrfo>> are so many of them to choose from." fsrfo>> -- Andrew Tanenbaum fsrfo>> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C fsrfo>> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo>> Name: not available fsrfo>> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo>> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo>> Desc: not available fsrfo>> Url : fsrfo>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/b6b2f887/attachment-0002.bin fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 34 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:42:33 +1030 fsrfo>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <200503031642.39981.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" fsrfo>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:45, Nicholas Basila wrote: >>> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm >>> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on >>> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried >>> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my >>> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this >>> failure is after the make depend... during the make): fsrfo>> How did you run ndiscvt? Where did you get the driver from? fsrfo>> etc.. fsrfo>> -- fsrfo>> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer fsrfo>> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au fsrfo>> "The nice thing about standards is that there fsrfo>> are so many of them to choose from." fsrfo>> -- Andrew Tanenbaum fsrfo>> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C fsrfo>> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo>> Name: not available fsrfo>> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo>> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo>> Desc: not available fsrfo>> Url : fsrfo>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/b6b2f887/attachment-0003.bin fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 35 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 01:20:58 -0500 fsrfo>> From: Nicholas Basila <mlists@northglobe.com> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo>> To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <4226ACCA.1020503@northglobe.com> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo>> Daniel O'Connor wrote: >>>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:45, Nicholas Basila wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm >>>>using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on >>>>5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried >>>>rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my >>>>original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this >>>>failure is after the make depend... during the make): >>>> >>>> >>> >>>How did you run ndiscvt? Where did you get the driver from? >>>etc.. >>> >>> >>> fsrfo>> Well, I've been using the official HP driver. I ran the utility like so: fsrfo>> ndiscvt -i name_of_nt_driver.inf -s name_of_nt_driver.sys -o fsrfo>> /tmp/ndis_driver_data.h fsrfo>> I then copied it to the compile directory of my kernel. Make depend runs fsrfo>> correctly, but it crashes out during the linking phase of make. I have fsrfo>> these options at the bottom of my kernel config: fsrfo>> options NDISAPI fsrfo>> device ndis fsrfo>> device wlan fsrfo>> As I said, this worked perfectly with 5.3 and even 5-current before the fsrfo>> 5.3 release. I tried building the stable version of ndiscvt, and that fsrfo>> didn't produce a different header file. I did a cvsup two days ago, got fsrfo>> the error, and did a new cvsup tonight. fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 36 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:30:44 +0100 (CET) fsrfo>> From: pcasidy@casidy.com fsrfo>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo>> To: mlists@northglobe.com fsrfo>> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <20050303062137.3DFFFB86C@smtp.casidy.net> fsrfo>> Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo>> On 3 Mar, Nicholas Basila wrote: >>> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm >>> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on >>> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried >>> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my >>> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this >>> failure is after the make depend... during the make): >>> >>> linking kernel >>> if_ndis_pccard.o(.text+0xc): In function `ndis_probe_pccard': >>> : undefined reference to `drv_data' >>> if_ndis_pci.o(.text+0x14): In function `ndis_probe_pci': >>> : undefined reference to `drv_data' >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/HP09. >>> >>> >>> This card worked fine with 5.3-RELEASE. It's a Broadcom 54G wireless NIC >>> on an HP zd7140us notebook. Any thoughts? fsrfo>> I had exactly this problem when my ndis_driver_data.h was built with a fsrfo>> previous version of ndiscvt. You may have to update your world too. fsrfo>> Hope that helps! fsrfo>> Phil. fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 37 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:32:36 +0100 fsrfo>> From: Emanuel Strobl <emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> fsrfo>> Subject: -PRErelease and ACPI: no PRT entry for 0.1.INTA fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <200503030732.41525@harrymail> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" fsrfo>> Dear Hackers, fsrfo>> on one remote machine I see the following error fsrfo>> (RELENG_5 from this night): fsrfo>> pcib0: no PRT entry for 0.1.INTA fsrfo>> I have only ssh access and putting "-v" in fsrfo>> /boot.config didn't help me getting fsrfo>> a verbose dmesg. fsrfo>> Anyway, I think it's caused by a bogus BIOS but I wanted to make sure having fsrfo>> it reported. fsrfo>> Last version was RELENG_5 from Nov. 5th and I also had a ACPI error but more fsrfo>> detailed. Unfortunately I lost the output.... fsrfo>> Thanks, fsrfo>> -Harry fsrfo>> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo>> Name: not available fsrfo>> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo>> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo>> Desc: not available fsrfo>> Url : fsrfo>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/4105ef46/attachment-0001.bin fsrfo>> ------------------------------ fsrfo>> Message: 38 fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:27:46 +1030 fsrfo>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo>> To: Nicholas Basila <mlists@northglobe.com> fsrfo>> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo>> Message-ID: <200503031727.52538.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" fsrfo>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:50, Nicholas Basila wrote: >>> Well, I've been using the official HP driver. I ran the utility like so: fsrfo>> I don't know where the official HP driver is (hint: a URL would be handy) >>> ndiscvt -i name_of_nt_driver.inf -s name_of_nt_driver.sys -o >>> /tmp/ndis_driver_data.h >>> >>> I then copied it to the compile directory of my kernel. Make depend runs >>> correctly, but it crashes out during the linking phase of make. I have >>> these options at the bottom of my kernel config: >>> >>> options NDISAPI >>> device ndis >>> device wlan fsrfo>> I would suggest building it as a module as it's much simpler (unless you're fsrfo>> booting over this interface - which is doubtful) fsrfo>> eg.. fsrfo>> cd /usr/src/sys/modules/if_ndis fsrfo>> cp /tmp/foo.inf /tmp/foo.sys . fsrfo>> ndiscvt -i foo.inf -s foo.sys -o ndis_driver_data.h fsrfo>> make fsrfo>> make install >>> As I said, this worked perfectly with 5.3 and even 5-current before the >>> 5.3 release. I tried building the stable version of ndiscvt, and that >>> didn't produce a different header file. I did a cvsup two days ago, got >>> the error, and did a new cvsup tonight. fsrfo>> Make sure your userland and kernel are in sync - ie install world to match fsrfo>> your new kernel. You may be building against stale headers. fsrfo> В данном сообщении отсутствует тема письма. fsrfo> Информирую Вас, что подобные сообщения если и будут рассматриваться, fsrfo> то в последнюю очередь. fsrfo> Прошу Вас впредь, для ускорения обработки Ваших сообщений указывать их fsrfo> тему. fsrfo> -- fsrfo> С уважением, fsrfo> Пенерджи Р.В. fsrfo> Начальник отдела ИТ ЗАО Корпорация "СХолдинг" fsrfo> mailto:prv@s-holding.ru fsrfo> mailto:prv0@yandex.ru fsrfo> +7 095 933-8678 fsrfo> +7 095 933-2811 fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 2 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:13:18 +0300 fsrfo> From: "Artem Kuchin" <matrix@itlegion.ru> fsrfo> Subject: Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo> FreebBSD 4.10 fsrfo> To: "pete wright" <nomadlogic@gmail.com> fsrfo> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo> Message-ID: <00b101c51fd1$3fd448f0$0c00a8c0@artem> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; fsrfo> reply-type=original fsrfo> pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300, Artem Kuchin <matrix@itlegion.ru> >> wrote: >>> Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2) >>> controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ? >>> >>> It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB >>> IDE driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for >>> sure). >> >> sorry I don't know of any really cheap one's off hand, altho I do have >> experience with 3Ware RAID cards on 4.x. They seemed to work well, >> and they are less expensive than proper SCSI cards...altho slower. If >> cost really an issue would it be worth mirroring your disks in >> software via VINUM? fsrfo> Well, i don't trust software raids. But 3ware is probably one of the most fsrfo> expensive raid 0,1 controllers. There must be something around 40$ which fsrfo> freebsd supports. Does anyone known any model? fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Regards, fsrfo> Artem Kuchin fsrfo> IT Legion Ltd. fsrfo> Moscow, Russia fsrfo> www.itlegion.ru fsrfo> matrix@itlegion.ru fsrfo> +7 095 232-0338 fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 3 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 09:10:00 +0000 fsrfo> From: Gerald de la Pascua <geralddelapascua@gmail.com> fsrfo> Subject: Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo> FreebBSD 4.10 fsrfo> To: pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com> fsrfo> Cc: Artem Kuchin <matrix@itlegion.ru> fsrfo> Message-ID: <1bcf5ef9050303011052f49965@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo> we have had very good experiences with the basic 3ware cards, fsrfo> I would recommend them, easy to install, reliable, and good perfomance, fsrfo> in the uk they cost just over 100 pounds, so a similar price to two fsrfo> disks to plug into them. When a disk fails you would willingly pay fsrfo> many times this amount, fsrfo> kind regards, Gerald fsrfo> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:50:41 -0800, pete wright fsrfo> <nomadlogic@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300, Artem Kuchin <matrix@itlegion.ru> wrote: >> > Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2) >> > controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ? >> > >> > It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB IDE >> > driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for sure). >> >> sorry I don't know of any really cheap one's off hand, altho I do have >> experience with 3Ware RAID cards on 4.x. They seemed to work well, >> and they are less expensive than proper SCSI cards...altho slower. If >> cost really an issue would it be worth mirroring your disks in >> software via VINUM? >> >> -p >> >> -- >> ~~o0OO0o~~ >> Pete Wright >> www.nycbug.org >> NYC's *BSD User Group >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 4 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:23:56 +0300 fsrfo> From: "Artem Kuchin" <matrix@itlegion.ru> fsrfo> Subject: Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo> FreebBSD 4.10 fsrfo> To: <gerald@homes-on-line.com>, "pete wright" <nomadlogic@gmail.com> fsrfo> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo> Message-ID: <00d401c51fd2$bd034af0$0c00a8c0@artem> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; fsrfo> reply-type=original fsrfo> Gerald de la Pascua <geralddelapascua@gmail.com> wrote: >> we have had very good experiences with the basic 3ware cards, >> I would recommend them, easy to install, reliable, and good >> perfomance, in the uk they cost just over 100 pounds, so a similar >> price to two >> disks to plug into them. When a disk fails you would willingly pay >> many times this amount, fsrfo> 3ware controllers are one of the most expensive ones. I am sure there fsrfo> are good controllers which cost a lot less and work with freebsd. Do fsrfo> you know any? fsrfo> Artem fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 5 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:18:23 +0900 (JST) fsrfo> From: Yoshiaki Kasahara <kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp> fsrfo> Subject: 1000baseTX? fsrfo> To: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: fsrfo> <20050303.181823.216808984.kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp> fsrfo> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo> Hello, fsrfo> In man pages, dmesg and ifconfig of FreeBSD5, GbE operation over fsrfo> twisted pair is mostly referred as '1000baseTX'. I guess most of them fsrfo> should be replaced by '1000baseT'. 1000base"TX" and 1000base"T" are fsrfo> different standard and they are not compatible ("TX" needs CAT6 cable fsrfo> and uses pairs in different way). Also 1000baseTX support is very fsrfo> rare yet. I'm sorry I'm not sure if some devices really support "TX". fsrfo> For example, I have a NIC based on Realtek RTL8169S and its manual fsrfo> says "It supports 1000BASE-T/100BASE-TX/10BASE-T". fsrfo> In dmesg: fsrfo> rgephy0: <RTL8169S/8110S media interface> on miibus1 fsrfo> rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, fsrfo> 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto fsrfo> Regards, fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Yoshiaki Kasahara fsrfo> kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 6 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:04:30 +0000 fsrfo> From: Jake Stride <nsuk@users.sourceforge.net> fsrfo> Subject: Linking with CUPS Issue fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <4226E12E.7000209@users.sourceforge.net> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo> I have had a look on google and the archives and although I have seen fsrfo> people with a similar issue I have not been able to find an answer to fsrfo> the issue I have. fsrfo> I am trying to compile the magicolor 2430DL printer dirvers and keep fsrfo> running into the following error: fsrfo> root@lancelot# make fsrfo> Linking rastertokmlf... fsrfo> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcups fsrfo> *** Error code 1 fsrfo> Stop in /root/magicolor2430DL-1.1.0. fsrfo> Now I have the following cups packages installed (I am using 5.3), what fsrfo> am I doing wrong? fsrfo> Thanks fsrfo> Jake fsrfo> root@lancelot# pkg_info | grep cups fsrfo> cups-1.1.23.0 The Common UNIX Printing System: Metaport to install fsrfo> comple fsrfo> cups-base-1.1.23.0_3 The Common UNIX Printing System: headers, libs, & fsrfo> daemons fsrfo> cups-lpr-1.1.23.0 The CUPS BSD and system V compatibility binaries fsrfo> (lp* comma fsrfo> cups-pstoraster-7.07_3 GNU Postscript interpreter for CUPS printing to fsrfo> non-PS prin fsrfo> gnome-cups-manager-0.28,1 Admistration tool for cups fsrfo> libgnomecups-0.1.14,1 Support library for gnome cups admistration fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 7 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:09:55 +0100 fsrfo> From: Jared Earle <jearle@gmail.com> fsrfo> Subject: Re: Dual booting with Windows XP fsrfo> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo> Message-ID: <5bbc0cd6050303020977bbf94e@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo> On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:40:28 -0700, Didier Caamano fsrfo> <nemesisdivina@gennux.ca> wrote: >> Hello everyone: >> >> This might sound rather foolish, but I need some assistance on how to >> dual boot FBSD 5.3 with WinXP. >> >> I have to Hard Drives, Windows is in the first drive, and I want to >> install FBSD on the second. No in the installation process I choose to >> create the partitions to the second Hard Drive, then it ask me if I want >> to install the boot manager, to which I answer yes, then it ask me where >> to install it, and I choose to the First Hard drive, is that ok? well, >> what happens is that after I choose the installer send me to disklabel >> to slice the Hard drive, but it show the First hard drive. >> >> am I making any sense at all? I thought that installing the boot manager >> was going to be a straigh forward process, is there anything wrong with >> what I am experiencing? Any help will be appreciated. fsrfo> If you want Windows on the first drive, then I recommend letting the fsrfo> Windows boot manager handle it. fsrfo> The handbook page on it is here, but it seems to be missing the fact fsrfo> that you can find the boot file (/boot/boot1) on the install CD. fsrfo> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#NT-BOOTLOADER fsrfo> Here's my tiny howto for fedora with a freebsd addendum: fsrfo> http://www.ramblingwaffles.net/DualBoot fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Jared Earle :: http://www.23x.net fsrfo> jearle@gmail.com :: There is no SPORK fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 8 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 04:18:13 -0600 fsrfo> From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> fsrfo> Subject: Need Help With mount_smbfs Error Message fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <4226E465.5050709@tundraware.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed fsrfo> I am running 4.11-stable (sources up-to-date as of today). I have fsrfo> a smb file system mounted on this machine (it is a samba share on another fsrfo> 4.11-stable box). I am seeing this message intermittently: fsrfo> smb_maperror:Unmapped error 1:158 fsrfo> What might be causing this? fsrfo> TIA, В данном сообщении отсутствует тема письма. Информирую Вас, что подобные сообщения если и будут рассматриваться, то в последнюю очередь. Прошу Вас впредь, для ускорения обработки Ваших сообщений указывать их тему. -- С уважением, Пенерджи Р.В. Начальник отдела ИТ ЗАО Корпорация "СХолдинг" mailto:prv@s-holding.ru mailto:prv0@yandex.ru +7 095 933-8678 +7 095 933-2811
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1914821434.20050303142858>