Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 10:58:31 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: HEADSUP! netgraph Metadata changing. Message-ID: <20040608065831.GC26822@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040608065235.GA56799@ip.net.ua> References: <20040607071701.GC17986@cell.sick.ru> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0406070034350.19288-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <20040607074037.GB18232@cell.sick.ru> <20040608065235.GA56799@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 09:52:35AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: R> > J> > J> In addition the ng_ksocket node adds info into metadata and I suspect R> > J> > J> there are people using that. R> > J> > R> > J> > Since ng_ksocket tags packets for itself only, we can safely change it. R> > J> R> > J> Since I did not add that code I am not very familiar with it or who uses R> > J> it. (or why) R> > J> R> > J> if this is true than yes we can do this.. R> > R> > It is used only on UDP connection, to send replies back to where the original R> > packets came from. R> > R> I wouldn't hardcode it this way. Rather, it just mimics the R> sendto()/recvfrom() semantics, to represent the "to"/"from" R> arguments, respectively. Pardon, haven't understand what do you suggest. You mean, that it'll be better if node originating packets will insert this tag? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040608065831.GC26822>