Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:39:23 +0000
From:      "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>
To:        d@delphij.net
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, delphij@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: vesa(4) and amd64
Message-ID:  <d873d5be0909180939p4fc43b1fvf07f26a8aab8b81f@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AAB017D.7090909@delphij.net>
References:  <d873d5be0909111303m3ea6d166k3f4d44025faadd77@mail.gmail.com> <4AAB017D.7090909@delphij.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/12/09, Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> wrote:

>
> b. f. wrote:
>> After the recent x86emu/vesa/dpms commits, I'm now able to use some
>> more graphics modes with syscons on amd64. That's good.  Not so good
>> is the fact that my HP Pavilion desktop running 9-CURRENT i386 r197085
>> with
>>
>> devic sc
>> options SC_PIXEL_MODE
>> device vga
>> options VGA_WIDTH90
>>
>> in the kernel and agp, dpms, x86emu, and vesa loaded as kernel modules
>> can no longer use the 132x60 mode that had been my default syscons
>> mode, and now yields a blank screen.  Even worse is the fact that my
>> Toshiba laptop, with nearly the same configuration, locks up with a
>> screen full of zeroes every time I load the new vesa kernel module,
>> when formerly it had no such problem.  Other than simplifying the
>> organization of the code, is there any advantage to be gained from
>> forcing those platforms that are capable of native vesa to use x86emu?
>>  Because up to this point there are serious disadvantages to doing so.
>
> I think it was caused by some unrelated change.  ddkprog@ has proposed a
> change, here is a slightly modified one, could you please give it a try?
>  I'll try to see if I can have some clue myself tonight.
>

With your suggested change on 9-CURRENT i386 r197299, my desktop can
now use the 132x60 mode, and some other modes that were causing
problems after the x86emu introduction.  Also, mode-switching no
longer forces a reboot.  There remain some problems with vesa/dpms
when attempting to wake up from a sleep state, but these may be acpi
or hardware problems.  However, with 9-CURRENT i386 r197295 and your
patch,  my laptop still hangs after displaying the VESA information
block when attempting to load the vesa kernel module.

Regards,
               b.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d873d5be0909180939p4fc43b1fvf07f26a8aab8b81f>