Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 00:01:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh@FreeBSD.org> To: lamer@properfucked.net, schweikh@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: standards/50889: NULL defined as 0 instead of (void *)0 Message-ID: <200304230701.h3N71I55023036@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Synopsis: NULL defined as 0 instead of (void *)0 State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed State-Changed-By: schweikh State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 22 23:56:12 PDT 2003 State-Changed-Why: #define NULL 0 is ISO 9899 compliant. A discussion if a change to #define NULL ((void*)0) would be beneficial has not shown a strong case either way. There are bugs that can be covered/uncovered with both definitions. In accordance with Newton's First Law, NULL is left as is. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=50889
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304230701.h3N71I55023036>