Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:27:01 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Zach Leslie <xaque208@gmail.com> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD needs Git to ensure repo integrity [was: 2012 incident] Message-ID: <CAF6rxgkcuCRssMniTSapK92aJOkcg996tF2o22yuKG1pt6mbdQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121120030445.GA38037@zjl.local> References: <CAD2Ti29UoFcHendR8CcdQ4FPNW1HH0O47B1i3JW00Lke2m2POg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonryjAOW-Ty%2Bs3wj6BfWiQzxSL-waEYnQ5wLv4eFjQ_4Q@mail.gmail.com> <20121120030445.GA38037@zjl.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 November 2012 22:04, Zach Leslie <xaque208@gmail.com> wrote: > I've always been confused by this. Which source repo is the true source > of truth? This changed a few months ago when ports and doc switched. As of now: - SVN is *the* source of truth. - CVS is exported from svn. It will eventually go away - git is exported from svn. It will remain as an option for developers (including myself). > To obtain the FreeBSD source, you can use CVS, SVN, or Git? Do all have > the same level of support? Are they all up to date? SVN is *always* up to date. We try really hard to keep the others up to date, but fail at times. > Also, local branching and merging is amazing. +1 - but one can always use git-svn. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgkcuCRssMniTSapK92aJOkcg996tF2o22yuKG1pt6mbdQ>