Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:34:46 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To:        Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   socklen_t (Re: Multicast problems [PATCH])
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.64.0706200824530.4695@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070620110702.GB929@lizard.fafoe.narf.at>
References:  <E1I0E3b-0000kk-Ky@clue.co.za> <46765CB9.9020105@incunabulum.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0706180833080.23884@sea.ntplx.net> <4676C30E.7040300@incunabulum.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0706181344060.24865@sea.ntplx.net> <4676C952.5000607@incunabulum.net> <4676D168.3050502@incunabulum.net> <4678529A.3080308@incunabulum.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0706191823040.1099@sea.ntplx.net> <20070620110702.GB929@lizard.fafoe.narf.at>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:36:39PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
>>  POSIX states that:
>>
>>    o The <sys/socket.h> header shall define the type socklen_t,
>>      which is an integer type of width of at least 32 bits; see
>>      APPLICATION USAGE.
>>
>>  and goes on to state:
>>
>>    o The <sys/socket.h> header shall define the unsigned integer
>>      type sa_family_t.
>>
>>  This seems to imply that our socklen_t should not be an unsigned
>>  integer (uint32_t), but a signed integer.  In APPLICATION USAGE,
>>  POSIX states:
>
> I don't understand how you come to that conclusion.  Why does not
> mentioning whether socklen_t is signed or unsigned imply it should be
> signed?

Because it explicitly says unsigned for sa_family_t and does not
say unsigned for socklen_t.  To me, "integer" means a C (signed)
integer.  The fact that older APIs and implementations used "int"
might support the argument to use int32_t just for compatibility
reasons.  As it stands now, portable code has to have some sort
of autoconfig to determine whether or not to use socklen_t or int.
I don't see how you can do this with #ifdefs unless you know
OS version numbers and when socklen_t first got introduced.

>>    To forestall portability problems, it is recommended that
>>    applications not use values larger than 23^1 -1 for the
>>    socklen_t type.
>
> That just means that those values will wrap to negative values if
> socklen_t is a signed integer type.

-- 
DE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0706200824530.4695>