Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 06:34:51 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: John Hay <jhay@meraka.org.za> Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpthread shared library version number Message-ID: <20061103063336.A14555@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20061103055522.GA54952@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> References: <20061102115058.GB10961@rambler-co.ru> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611020824150.12236@sea.ntplx.net> <20061102140948.GA70915@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20061102182419.GC774@rambler-co.ru> <454A60E9.7020303@FreeBSD.org> <20061102214157.GC2028@rambler-co.ru> <454A6B07.3090003@FreeBSD.org> <454A6E09.9080200@errno.com> <20061103042116.GA50470@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611022328050.16733@sea.ntplx.net> <20061103055522.GA54952@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, John Hay wrote: > You can also track it in a file or with forced commits, with very little if > any additional effort. > > I thought one of the ideas of -current was that it serves as a testing > ground for new code. It seems we currently limit that testing to the box in > the corner that you just recompile and reboot and then say "FreeBSD can > still compile itself and reboot". You limit the amount of testing you get > out of current this way though. Dunno about you, but I run FreeBSD on my notebook and desktops. :-) Doing anything else, as you point out, will result in inadequate testing. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061103063336.A14555>