Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:52:01 -0400 From: "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" <jeroen@vangelderen.org> To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, Archie Cobbs <archie@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net Makefile ports/net/suckblow Makefile ports/net/suckblow/files md5 ports/net/suckblow/pkg COMM Message-ID: <395A6571.4A0802B6@vangelderen.org> References: <200006280031.RAA89688@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006271743500.91253-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> <395A13F9.1521.181F78B@localhost> <20000627230748.G42285@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <395A177E.3E12E157@vangelderen.org> <20000628133440.F8602@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Will Andrews wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 11:19:26AM -0400, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
> > What's the motivation? I find the COMMENT description pretty
> > useless in most cases but there is probably a good reason?
>
> There is no reason why the commit messages shouldn't contain at least
> some information about a new port.
>
> I don't like uninformative commits.
Me neither. I meant to say that I'd rather see the contents of
DESCR posted in the commit message.
Cheers,
Jeroen
--
Jeroen C. van Gelderen o _ _ _
jeroen@vangelderen.org _o /\_ _ \\o (_)\__/o (_)
_< \_ _>(_) (_)/<_ \_| \ _|/' \/
(_)>(_) (_) (_) (_) (_)' _\o_
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?395A6571.4A0802B6>