Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 21:25:52 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: James Housley <jim@thehousleys.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nuking "unsafe" protocols (was Re: Upcoming rc.conf changes not loading certain currently loaded daemons) Message-ID: <200008250325.VAA31807@billy-club.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 24 Aug 2000 17:56:28 EDT." <39A59A0C.7588265E@thehousleys.net> References: <39A59A0C.7588265E@thehousleys.net> <251BF6012D6B4A49A4109B1C3289A7B5BB78@purgatory.jumpweb.com> <39A59992.F42F03EC@denverweb.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <39A59A0C.7588265E@thehousleys.net> James Housley writes: : blaine wrote: : > Umm, why not just use openbsd if security is the primary concern? : > : Why shouldn't we provide the best level of security possible, using : OpenBSD as a target? We should be targetting things at a much higher level than OpenBSD :-) Otherwise we run the risk of being an "also ran" in the security area. theo and folks over there have done a good job, and we need to do better. We're not there yet, however. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008250325.VAA31807>