Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:33:38 +0000 From: Josef El-Rayes <josef@daemon.li> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: rik@cronyx.ru Subject: Re: small note to GENERIC for isa dependency Message-ID: <20040421143336.GA31427@daemon.li> In-Reply-To: <20040421.082332.56347399.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20040414155525.GD562@jenny.daemon.li> <20040419183108.L47248@carver.gumbysoft.com> <40851021.6090706@cronyx.ru> <20040421.082332.56347399.imp@bsdimp.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>: > And I do think there's code that unwisely assumes isa will always be > there. whats the sense of a removable option which will only result in a broken kernel build, if it is removed? why not hide it or make a note so no one tries to remove it? -josef -- Josef El-Rayes (__) Email: josef@daemon.li \\\'',) Web: http://daemon.li/ \/ \ ^ FreeBSD: josef@FreeBSD.org .\._/_) [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBQIaGPVnFItmnnbU8AQKicQf+PQ2H4WCo9gcxI8UWbHls64dB37oLvJ1G Ko4YrLkhShGINZpZjioRoxfOKwuGATt3jXIxNTCU1bROAtX4XuHxeWBvm3Nt2Sd1 /n08fd5ZutwpQR0YclRUw/BY4yXwxUEv3xhALeM2pRhCwD1Kt9lfC6ELfen94Gs3 M9iqFLD1He+xt0JM3wqkKqM6RltC0W8WtVSqlYIMaFwZvh3SQw92dTOE1QqmW7NZ 0HEb02XsiN08rMDPuQ0UyeI3+unHYYyhd3ZFbso/rSwLxi7E8hK8XAQGArzYUlEc ay7YYeUNedLCjN3Tw26ZGbRP+3A2FIe9//+iuU+ZkEgTn9Je9M9s1Q== =UHu2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040421143336.GA31427>