Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:15:44 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org> To: Julien Laffaye <jlaffaye@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/php52 Makefile Message-ID: <20110630231543.GA249@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <4E0C59C1.8080605@FreeBSD.org> References: <201106291951.p5TJpHh7000414@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110630032003.GA670@magic.hamla.org> <4E0C59C1.8080605@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 12:10:57 +0100, Julien Laffaye wrote: > On 06/30/2011 04:20, Sahil Tandon wrote: > > Why bump PORTREVISION if the new option is off by default and does > > not affect the default package? This is sometimes a grey area, so > > please do not misconstrue my question for hostility; I just want to > > understand your rationale. For context, ale@ added the LINKTHR > > option to lang/php5 last year without a bump: > > I could have sworn that I removed it after applying the PR patch. > Apparently that was not the case :( Sorry for that. No biggie, but thank you for clarifying. -- Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110630231543.GA249>