Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 17:40:49 -0600 From: Greg Lewis <glewis@misty.eyesbeyond.com> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CTM - any users left? Message-ID: <20030617234049.GA13448@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <200306171837.h5HIbxHh002133@grimreaper.grondar.org> References: <20030617171408.GA7693@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <200306171837.h5HIbxHh002133@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 07:37:59PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > Greg Lewis writes: > > I have a Perl script (ambitiously called ctmup :) to automate the > > downloading and installing of CTM deltas via FTP (even though I could > > use CVSup, CTM was faster). I used this up until a short time before > > I became a committer (I needed CVS diff :), although I was never > > subscribed to the email updates. > > > > So, I concur that not everybody who uses ctm is subscribed to the > > email updates, FWIW. > > All this is adding up to overwhelming evidence for CTM being > perfectly home as a port, no? I have no objections to that, just adding to the data point that the size of the mailing list != size of the user base. I'll even offer to help out with getting PRs committed for such a port. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030617234049.GA13448>