Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:52:31 +0200 From: Vlad Galu <dudu@diaspar.rdsnet.ro> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: interface bonding Message-ID: <20031222205231.7bad28ab.dudu@diaspar.rdsnet.ro> In-Reply-To: <20031222184812.87890.qmail@web60808.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20031222184812.87890.qmail@web60808.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Mon__22_Dec_2003_20_52_31_+0200_kv.B0LcOf/10LSOt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Richard Bejtlich <richard_bejtlich@yahoo.com> writes: |Thanks to Dmitry's tip on ng_eiface, I'm happy to |report using the following configuration to bond |interfaces with ng_one2many and a virtual interface |ngeth0. | Thanks for the tip. I have one question, though. Is the throughtput of the ngeth0 interface equal to the sum of the throughtput on each physical interface ? During my tests with ng_fec I noticed that the setup was only capable of failover; it only transferred frames on one interface. If the interface went down for some reason, it switched to the other one. ---- If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it. --Signature=_Mon__22_Dec_2003_20_52_31_+0200_kv.B0LcOf/10LSOt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/5z1xP5WtpVOrzpcRAkSgAJwPSN5hBjGjY/cAoDX8M4Hbs1S3yQCfXLMh QFTQM8f0/mtwy4dHu7hDwMs= =h4BM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__22_Dec_2003_20_52_31_+0200_kv.B0LcOf/10LSOt--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031222205231.7bad28ab.dudu>