Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:08:43 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/dump Makefile cache.c dump.8 dump.h main.c traverse.c
Message-ID:  <200301141908.h0EJ8hhd081523@apollo.backplane.com>
References:  <200301131942.h0DJgfbN010760@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030114100821.GE61405@starjuice.net> <200301141055.h0EAtC2Y079386@apollo.backplane.com> <20030114111430.GJ61405@starjuice.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

:
:On (2003/01/14 02:55), Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:>     Well, the NetBSD specification is aweful.  I would never impose it
:>     on our poor sysops!  It's completely non-obvious and you need a
:>     calculator to figure out how large a cache you want.  It's in multiples
:>     of the 'readblksize', which defaults to 32K.  I don't know WHAT they 
:>     were thinking!
:
:Ah.  I thought it used 512 byte units, which would have been tolerable.
:
:In that case, I'm no longer one of the people who care about
:compatibility with NetBSD here.
:
:Still, you might save yourself some pain by waiting a little longer
:before you MFC. :-)
:
:Anyway, thanks for bringing in the feature.
:
:Ciao,
:Sheldon.

   Sorry, I misspoke originally.  I originally did say it was 512 byte
   units but then I looked at the NetBSD code more carefully and it's
   definitely in readblksize chunks.  I misread the numarg() call NetBSD
   was making.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200301141908.h0EJ8hhd081523>