Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 16:17:30 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: syscall changes to deal with 32->64 changes. Message-ID: <20020507161730.A31409@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200205072106.g47L6YuT000379@apollo.backplane.com>; from dillon@apollo.backplane.com on Tue, May 07, 2002 at 02:06:34PM -0700 References: <XFMail.20020507140110.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200205071940.g47Jehl84130@apollo.backplane.com> <20020507131314.B29014@dragon.nuxi.com> <200205072106.g47L6YuT000379@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 02:06:34PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > : > :On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 12:40:43PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :> the way for us to allow natively compiled multi-architectural support. > :> e.g. consider this: > :> > :> cc -ABI4 ... > :> cc -ABI5 ... > :> cc -ABILinux ... > :> cc -ABIOpenBSD ... > : > :Honestly, why do we have this need? It seems to fall into the "it would > :be nice"; but seldomly used. > > Well, how do you intend to test the new ABI vector? One moves forward and does not look back. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020507161730.A31409>