Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 16:26:00 -0600 (CST) From: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com> To: dcs@newsguy.com, freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: feedback on CD install of 4.0-RC2 Message-ID: <200002192226.QAA92457@prism.flugsvamp.com> In-Reply-To: <local.mail.freebsd-current/38AF1186.8D04CE12@newsguy.com> References: <local.mail.freebsd-current/79206.950898990@zippy.cdrom.com> <local.mail.freebsd-current/vafemaanoxf.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <local.mail.freebsd-current/38AF1186.8D04CE12@newsguy.com> you write: >Kai Großjohann wrote: >> >> "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> writes: >> >> > I really kinda wish you'd point them to Novice^H^H^H^H^HStandard >> > instead since it does more than be a bit more verbose, it also makes >> > sure that all the appropriate steps are covered and prevents even >> > relatively skilled people from hanging themselves. >> >> Does this mean that this option should be called `guided'? I know a >> little bit about Unix but haven't installed FreeBSD more than five >> times or so. And I always thought that the novice install meant that >> I didn't get as many choices... > >"Guided". I like it. That's *PRECISELY* what this installation option >is. There is NO difference in the number of choices available in any of >the three types. > >Guided/Express/Expert. That's my vote. Cool, seconded. I actually use "novice" most of the time, simply because I like the hints that help me not to screw up, and I've been using this option (or equivalent) since 1.1.5 at least. Guided sounds like a better description to me. -- Jonathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200002192226.QAA92457>