Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r317094 - head/share/mk
Message-ID:  <201704191633.v3JGXWmu031427@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <1709565.BYcnqjiFaR@ralph.baldwin.cx>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 01:28:37 AM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:45:25PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 07:30:13 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:27:48PM +0000, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Author: jhb
> > > > > Date: Tue Apr 18 16:27:48 2017
> > > > > New Revision: 317094
> > > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/317094
> > > > > 
> > > > > Log:
> > > > >   Disable in-tree GDB by default on x86, mips, and powerpc.
> > > > >   
> > > > >   GDB in ports contains all of the functionality as GDB in base
> > > > >   (including kgdb) for these platforms along with additional
> > > > >   functionality.  In-tree GDB remains enabled on ARM and sparc64.
> > > > >   GDB in ports does not currently support kernel debugging on arm,
> > > > >   and ports GDB for sparc64 has not been tested (though it does
> > > > >   include sparc64 support).
> > > > >   
> > > > >   Reviewed by:	bdrewery, emaste, imp
> > > > >   Relnotes:	yes
> > > > >   Sponsored by:	DARPA / AFRL
> > > > >   Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10399
> > > > 
> > > > Generating core.txt now complety broken?
> > > 
> > > No.  crashinfo has supported gdb from ports for quite a while now.
> > > If you 'pkg install gdb' crashinfo defaults to using the ports gdb over
> > > the base one already.
> > 
> > I am about clean install, w/o ports.
> 
> Until we get some sort of klldb support that will not work.  However,
> we already have platforms now where /usr/bin/gdb doesn't work for that.
> riscv and aarch64 aren't supported in ancient gdb, and the MIPS
> /usr/bin/gdb didn't really work for me in my testing.

So we break what worked on a Tier1 Platform?  With my "user" hat on
these are the exact kind of breakages that send me looking for another
platform to run on.  We far to often just go oh you can do X y and Z
to get around what we broke forgetting that the user 6 months from now
when this hits a release isnt gona come ask, he may just go down the
road to something else.

Remove gdb WHEN klldb can replace it, not a day before.  Using "oh its
broken on aarch64 and mips" is not a reason to break things on i386/amd64.

Yes, I know we want to get gnu stuff out of the tree, but that needs
to come AFTER a proper replacement is avaliable.

> 
> > Also, how to generate core.txt after crash, reboot and install gdb
> > from ports? (port instaled after crash)
> 
> You can always run crashinfo by hand.

/me starts to look for a new OS, this one is not very good at user support.


-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201704191633.v3JGXWmu031427>