Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Jan 2006 19:05:38 +0800
From:      Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com>
To:        Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>
Cc:        Andrea Campi <andrea+freebsd_current@webcom.it>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Darren Pilgrim <darren.pilgrim@bitfreak.org>
Subject:   Re: sudo in basesystem (was: fetch extension - use local filenamefrom content-disposition header)
Message-ID:  <c21e92e20601060305k18799295k4ee0ea3176a4e309@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060106105409.GA29355@uk.tiscali.com>
References:  <20051230104816.GA1779@webcom.it> <001601c60d86$0a8fe8e0$642a15ac@smiley> <20051230235132.GC1779@webcom.it> <43B5CA24.5030604@samsco.org> <20060106105409.GA29355@uk.tiscali.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/6/06, Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 05:00:36PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> > Now, if portupgrade
> > were written in C or even C++, it would be a no-brainer to import.
>
> Does sysutils/portmanager meet the requirements?
You have my vote for this one too.

Jiawei Ye
--
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
               --inspired by The Tao of Programming



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c21e92e20601060305k18799295k4ee0ea3176a4e309>