Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:39:40 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, eadler@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP question: Is this simultaneous close handling broken? Message-ID: <52CC903C.5090706@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <52CC8246.7080609@wemm.org> References: <52CB3AE9.3030107@wemm.org> <52CC5F2E.5030201@wemm.org> <52CC8246.7080609@wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 1/7/2014 5:40 PM, Peter Wemm wrote: > The packet may be dropped without processing the FIN flag. > MFC after: never Hi, Are there any potential side effects to this fix ? The original author said they were not going to MFC due to possible regressions. I know you probably see more FreeBSD traffic then most at Y!, and so are very sensitive to this, but thought I would ask for clarification. ---Mike - -- - ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSzJA8AAoJEJXHwM2kc8rXYJUH/3Hb7Yh7Lv/sAEjRjN5gN9id C9B6OlBY3NWfSVYTFngBzqcePuxsGXD4gELA1QQuGa4B2/dYgu62u0+zDdfCyVGx 7WVQlsrg2To9y8Z4SCZ3vCHJ20GxTNtCJEcySldcvCl8Z2Xn2cIk0BQmi5n7icVx z0ZIcWBTCNskfcLI6jHNFZ6dslRQy3xyleOpp1heQUyaVpfMRNZvOfoL1hnEnS9H FpnhIdFSKJ48b9Vw4Xql62A+LfCUHHa/Ey8rjEp5K90FTByPcNaDiVddNHZmBVAO lTmOobA2zsFzSh3fgnXikjCS4MA+3rTKHscduihk4vf6AIKLWx00h4Bp0n7AGoY= =+cGv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52CC903C.5090706>