Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:38:48 +0100 From: Hugo Silva <hugo@barafranca.com> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Borja Marcos <BORJAMAR@SARENET.ES> Subject: Re: ZFS status now in June? / stable enough for a file server? Message-ID: <46791FD8.4050003@barafranca.com> In-Reply-To: <F1242A6A-71B3-429D-83A5-D8060176ABD4@SARENET.ES> References: <1182338018.10483.27.camel@bigapple.omnis.ch> <F1242A6A-71B3-429D-83A5-D8060176ABD4@SARENET.ES>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Borja Marcos wrote: > > On 20 Jun 2007, at 13:13, Olivier Mueller wrote: > >> So if you are already using ZFS in "pre-production", I would be glad for >> a short "go/no go" feedback, thanks :-) > > I already jumped into the wagon yesterday with a non-critical machine :) > > So far I'm happy. Not that I've done a lot of tests, just made some > make worlds over ZFS filesystems. I installed the June FreeBSD 7 > snapshot and cvsupped yesterday. > > > > > > > Borja. > > ---------------- > "The thing he realised about the windows was this: because they had > been converted into openable windows after they had first been > designed to be impregnable, they were, in fact, much less secure than > if they had been designed as openable windows in the first place." > Douglas Adams, "Mostly Harmless" > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Been using it myself on i386 for a couple of weeks, all I did was disabling prefetch and lowering maxvnodes as recommended; Copied over 120GB of data and been actively using ZFS (with daily snapshots on /home et all) for the past weeks, I have no complains. No panics, nothing :) Hugo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46791FD8.4050003>