Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 17:51:32 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 231659] [em] 12-ALPHA7 r338900 crashes with IPsec on network load Message-ID: <bug-231659-7501-eS9lTW9WGI@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-231659-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-231659-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D231659 --- Comment #25 from Lev A. Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #23) Now I have: igb + AESNI + bpf =E2=80=94 one crash on older revision, no crashes for sev= eral hours of testing on newer revisions. It is very first stack trace, and I can not reproduce it anymore (with or without bpf). Looks like, we could skip this,= as it is not reproducible. em + !AESNI =E2=80=94 crash with or without bpf. All other stack traces (wi= th IBVARIANTS and without them) are for this configuration. Looks like, bpf is= not evolved at all. Unfortunately, I can not swap NICs or CPUs, as it is embedded-like hardware with everything soldered on board. I'll try igb + !AESNI tonight by unloading aesni.ko in first place. I'll send you URL for kernels + dumps via e-mail, as I'm not sure it doesn't contain sensitive data (it should not, but though). 11-STABLE which serves as "other end" of this test setup is r338960. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-231659-7501-eS9lTW9WGI>