Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:52:27 +0300
From:      Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass@teledomenet.gr>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: i can't get ppp running
Message-ID:  <200708291252.27513.nvass@teledomenet.gr>
In-Reply-To: <46D5391F.5060502@gmail.com>
References:  <46D5391F.5060502@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 29 August 2007 12:15, deeptech71@gmail.com wrote:
> Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
>  >> The tcpdump test displays PADI! OK, so not in bridging more?
>  >
>  > No, PADI is your request for initiating a PPPoE connection.
>  > You should see an offer(PADO). Something like this:
>  > 09:17:56.744957 PPPoE PADI [Service-Name] [Host-Uniq
>  > 0x0400000007000000] 09:18:01.731345 PPPoE PADI [Service-Name]
>  > [Host-Uniq 0x0400000007000000] 09:18:01.731694 PPPoE PADO [AC-Name
>  > "iris.teledomenet.gr"] [Service-Name]
>
> [Service-Name "*"] [Host-Uniq 0x0400000007000000] [AC-Cookie 0x80DEECC3]
>
>  > 09:18:01.731772 PPPoE PADR [Service-Name] [Host-Uniq
>  > 0x0400000008000000]
>
> [AC-Cookie 0x80DEECC3]
>
>  > 09:18:01.731786 PPPoE PADS [ses 0x46] [AC-Name "iris.teledomenet.gr"]
>
> [Service-Name] [Host-Uniq 0x0400000008000000] [AC-Cookie 0x80DEECC3]
>
>  > 09:18:01.732322 PPPoE  [ses 0x46] LCP, Conf-Request (0x01), id 22,
>  > length 18 09:18:01.736886 PPPoE  [ses 0x46] LCP, Conf-Request (0x01),
>  > id 0, length 19 09:18:01.737145 PPPoE  [ses 0x46] LCP, Conf-Reject
>  > (0x04), id 0, length 9 09:18:01.747045 PPPoE  [ses 0x46] LCP,
>  > Conf-Reject (0x04), id 22, length 8
>
> I get only things like this (without -v or -vv):
> 09:17:56.744957 PPPoE PADI [Service-Name] [Host-Uniq 0x0400000007000000]
>
> Like 3 of these lines. Just that. No PADO and nothing else whatsoever.

OK, once again, no replies from the outside world...
FreeBSD sends requests, but doesn't get any replies.

>
>  >> The modem is a Dialcom ADSL Bridge 1600, which sound like some
>  >> bridge, duh. I've searched for information about this product, there
>  >> is no support for it. Dialcom sells these things to ISPs only I
>  >> think. There's supposed to be a web interface to it, but I couldn't
>  >> get in there yet.
>  >
>  > Well, it's not optional to check the modem's settings:)
>  > The two settings you have to configure for bridging are:
>  > 1) enable bridging:)
>  > 2) correct virtual circuit, you have to use correct VPI/VCI.
>  >    You should get this from your ISP.
>  >

1) do this:
>  > Perhaps your modem has DHCP. Try "dhclient rl0". If you do get
>  > an address on your rl0, then do a "route -n get default" and
>  > try to connect to the gateway using a web browser.

2) post your network configuration, that is:
ifconfig -u
netstat -rnfinet

I asked in previous mail what's the purpose of ipfw and bridge.
Can you disable them? at least for testing purposes.

>  > Because your modem is probably not configured correctly. FreeBSD
>  > sends requests, but doesn't get any answers back. FreeBSD is widely
>  > tested with PPPoE, both in server and client environments.
>
> I mean
>
> LAN]--[Microsoft Windows XP w/ routing]--[Dialcom ADSL Bridge]--[line
> //WORKS LAN]----[Corega BAR SD hardware router]--[Dialcom ADSL
> Bridge]--[line //WORKS LAN]----------[FreeBSD software router]--[Dialcom
> ADSL Bridge]--[line //SUCKS :)
>
> What does FreeBSD suck at?

I know FreeBSD PPPoE doesn't suck for sure. Also, if FreeBSD
doesn't work for you, that doesn't have to mean it's broken.

Nikos



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200708291252.27513.nvass>