Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 19:18:11 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Assar Westerlund <assar@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>, Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/kerberos5/usr.bin Makefile src/kerberos5/usr.bin/k5su Makefile Message-ID: <200103051717.f25HHHR48516@gratis.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: <5lk864thzx.fsf@assaris.sics.se> ; from Assar Westerlund <assar@FreeBSD.ORG> "05 Mar 2001 15:20:18 %2B0100." References: <5lk864thzx.fsf@assaris.sics.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> writes: > > Will we always have this dichotomy between kblah/k5blah utilities? It is > > fairly annoying. Anecdotally, there don't seem to be many new Kerberos > > IV installations, & Kerberos V's utilities can get/list/trash version 4 > > & 5 tickets. > > Yes. My current plan of things to happen (in -current and after 4.3) > is to ditch the v4 programs basically and install the v5 ones under > the canonical names (with v4-compatibility if compiled in). And to > always build and install the krb5 programs/libraries, but ifdef'ing > the support in other programs. How does that sounds? Wonderful! If you need repo-copying done, I'm your man! -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103051717.f25HHHR48516>