Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 11:26:11 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gjournal and fstab Message-ID: <eif5g4$vbd$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20061102135854.GG53552@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <346a80220611011709j485b0e16jf9745d6eae848411@mail.gmail.com> <20061102111404.GD41596@submonkey.net> <20061102135404.GA83844@ramen.coleyandcheryl> <20061102135854.GG53552@garage.freebsd.pl>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > BTW. I suggest using 'async', which is safe when used with gjournal. This is a thing I've always wanted to ask - why is it safe? :) I guess it comes down to what exactly does async means - since it's a file system flag I've always considered that it delays data output from the file system layer to the lower layer (GEOM) - but in that case it's definitely not safe. At least my idea for gjournal is to use it with "sync" flag (and get the performance by writing everything sequentially).home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?eif5g4$vbd$1>