Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 11:26:11 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gjournal and fstab Message-ID: <eif5g4$vbd$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20061102135854.GG53552@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <346a80220611011709j485b0e16jf9745d6eae848411@mail.gmail.com> <20061102111404.GD41596@submonkey.net> <20061102135404.GA83844@ramen.coleyandcheryl> <20061102135854.GG53552@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > BTW. I suggest using 'async', which is safe when used with gjournal. This is a thing I've always wanted to ask - why is it safe? :) I guess it comes down to what exactly does async means - since it's a file system flag I've always considered that it delays data output from the file system layer to the lower layer (GEOM) - but in that case it's definitely not safe. At least my idea for gjournal is to use it with "sync" flag (and get the performance by writing everything sequentially).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?eif5g4$vbd$1>