Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:30:12 GMT From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/90042: acpi.4 should mention that ACPI_DEBUG depends on DDB. Message-ID: <200602281230.k1SCUCeV056143@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/90042; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/90042: acpi.4 should mention that ACPI_DEBUG depends on DDB. Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:18:42 +0200 On 2005-12-06 19:00, "Wojciech A. Koszek" <dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl> wrote: > System: FreeBSD laptop.freebsd.czest.pl 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: \ > Tue Dec 6 19:19:23 CET 2005 root@laptop.freebsd.czest.pl:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ACPITEST i386 > Please commit this patch or similar, since it must be documented somewhere > in basesystem. > diff -upr /usr/src/share/man/man4/acpi.4 src/share/man/man4/acpi.4 > --- /usr/src/share/man/man4/acpi.4 Fri Jul 15 19:35:25 2005 > +++ src/share/man/man4/acpi.4 Tue Dec 6 19:45:34 2005 > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ > .Cd "device acpi" > .Pp > .Cd "options ACPI_DEBUG" > +.Cd "options DDB" Is "DDB" really necessary though? I thought that ACPI_DEBUG only controls the amount of debugging messages printed to the system console; with or without a kernel debugger.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200602281230.k1SCUCeV056143>