Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:26:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@freebsd.org> Subject: some small patches Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304171618370.55166-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20030417185808.S76635-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Here are two small patches they are pretty non-controversial in my opinion. they are part of a bigger patch, but I'd like to get them in separatly to simplify the bigger one. the first patch: http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/IDLETD.diff moves the flag that identifies a thread as being one of the idle threads from the KSE to the thread. The code that wants to know already has a thread pointer, but not the KSE pointer so this makes more sense. The second patch: http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/sched_clock.diff makes the sched_ API entrypoint sched_clock() take a thread argument instead of a KSE. Once again, the callers have the thread pointer and not the KSE pointer, and in fact they probably should not have the KSE pointer. anyone object to these patches?home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0304171618370.55166-100000>
