Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 00:03:12 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Subject: Re: panic: Duplicate free of item 0xc433e420 from zone 0xc1045c00(g_bio) Message-ID: <41F18A30.3060109@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: <20050121225631.GA56201@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <p06200730be172d908fe6@[128.113.24.47]> <41F18768.4050809@DeepCore.dk> <20050121225631.GA56201@xor.obsecurity.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:51:20PM +0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote: > >>Garance A Drosihn wrote: >> >>>I got another panic. This time I got a clean core-dump, and I also >>>have a kernel with all the debugging symbols if that would help. >>>Here is some of the info. The system had been up about 18 hours >>>before the panic. The system was basically idle at the time of the >>>panic. This is a snapshot of current which I started to build at >>>about 2pm EST on January 20th. >> >>The duplicate free on failed ATA retry is known. I have a fix here >>locally but it doesnt apply to whats in -current.. >> >>However, -current has severe problems that provokes those timeouts for >>no good reason and in all my cases locks up hard. I just vasted last >>nights sleep hunting for what I thought was a bug in my WIP. I had >>PREEMPTION turned of etc, but it sitll failed in odd ways. >>Going back to Jan 10 00:00 UTC sources make things "just work" with >>PREEMPTION and all. My testbox has now moved around some 800 GB's of >>data with no problems with above backstep, on -current it fails within >>the first few Mbytes.. > > > Are you sure you have an up-to-date kernel? The bug phk fixed last > week might be related. I'm positive, latest tried sources from 2000 CET today. The bug phk fixed was fs related, I'm not convinced this is.. -- -Sørenhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41F18A30.3060109>