Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:35:07 GMT From: jhb@FreeBSD.org To: arthur.hartwig@nokia.com, jhb@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/100513: [smbus] Inconsistent definition of SMBus addresses in SMBus drivers Message-ID: <200902101335.n1ADZ7p6059156@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Synopsis: [smbus] Inconsistent definition of SMBus addresses in SMBus drivers State-Changed-From-To: open->patched State-Changed-By: jhb State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 10 13:32:39 UTC 2009 State-Changed-Why: I've recently changed ichsmb to be consistent with all the other SMBus controller drivers to require "left-adjusted" slave addresses (i.e. bit 0 is reserved and always 0). I've also documented this in smb(4). If you find that other smbus drivers are not following this standard, then we should fix those as well. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->jhb Responsible-Changed-By: jhb Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 10 13:32:39 UTC 2009 Responsible-Changed-Why: I've recently changed ichsmb to be consistent with all the other SMBus controller drivers to require "left-adjusted" slave addresses (i.e. bit 0 is reserved and always 0). I've also documented this in smb(4). If you find that other smbus drivers are not following this standard, then we should fix those as well. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=100513
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200902101335.n1ADZ7p6059156>