Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:28:05 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports MOVED ports/ports-mgmt Makefile ports/ports-mgmt/portsnap Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ports/ports-mgmt/portsnap/files patch-portsnap patch-portsnap.8 pkg-message.in Message-ID: <1231403285.51790.140.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <496549CC.4090506@FreeBSD.org> References: <200901072134.n07LYRcn081359@repoman.freebsd.org> <496549CC.4090506@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-8F0MXB8moaxzAZkLQiVG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Doug Barton p=ED=B9e v st 07. 01. 2009 v 16:33 -0800:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > - Remove portsnap port, it's now integrated into the base system
>=20
> Isn't this moving in the wrong direction? We keep talking about
> keeping ports tools in the ports collection so that they can more
> easily be updated for all users. Is that the plan, or is that not the
> plan?
You're seeing conspiracy where there is none, Doug :)
The port was IGNOREd on all supported FreeBSD versions --> it got removed.
It's that simple.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Just because you're an angel doesn't mean you have to be a fool.
--=-8F0MXB8moaxzAZkLQiVG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
iEYEABECAAYFAklluRUACgkQntdYP8FOsoLBqwCfWp66BiSGj7EF+yV4gx5E/q2T
f4wAniZAMf2FpG7iyxm87n0OZZ2Na5C5
=3EMZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-8F0MXB8moaxzAZkLQiVG--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1231403285.51790.140.camel>