Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 21:34:12 -0400 From: Tadayuki OKADA <tadayuki@mediaone.net> To: Andrew Hesford <ajh3@chmod.ath.cx> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: soft update should be default Message-ID: <20010504213412.3ee36a4f.tadayuki@mediaone.net> In-Reply-To: <20010504200443.A20673@cec.wustl.edu> References: <20010504205142.1a7013e6.tadayuki@mediaone.net> <20010504200443.A20673@cec.wustl.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 4 May 2001 20:04:43 -0500 Andrew Hesford <ajh3@chmod.ath.cx> wrote: > It only adds performance... the whole idea of soft updates is to get > async speed with sync reliability. Nothing is more reliable than > synchronous writes, since data is verified absolutely as it is written. I've heard that it always keeps consistency. So you can skip fsck after the crash. #I don't know the detail, so please someone correct me if I'm wrong. > Still... I do agree it should be the default, or at least an option that > can be set at install time. I think this summer I will be reinstalling > my system, to clean up the cruft that ~1/2 year of learning has built up > on my system. It would sure come in handy then. You can set it from the menu if you install 4.3-RELEASE. -- Tadayuki OKADA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010504213412.3ee36a4f.tadayuki>