Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 17:03:51 -0500 From: David Noel <david.i.noel@gmail.com> To: Alnis Morics <alnis.morics@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MITM attacks against portsnap and freebsd-update Message-ID: <CAHAXwYCjAtU3Wh-Y=juxaYQCU=om=bqonaRiq12VXs7nGT_fwA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <537A704D.6010209@gmail.com> References: <CAHAXwYBEtqxpDZJBhRF1=QDi6v97qQvJeYUbDE0kYqEsMbvf_w@mail.gmail.com> <537A704D.6010209@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/19/14, Alnis Morics <alnis.morics@gmail.com> wrote: > On 05/19/2014 23:28, David Noel wrote: >> I also think it would be an appropriate time to discuss retiring >> portsnap. > Subversion checkouts and updates take much more time than Porstnap. My experience has been that both portsnap and svn update typically take under a minute to complete. Regardless, don't most people run this in the background with portsnap cron?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHAXwYCjAtU3Wh-Y=juxaYQCU=om=bqonaRiq12VXs7nGT_fwA>