Date: 15 Dec 2001 00:42:07 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Peter Sanchez <fut0n@linuxforlesbians.org> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/32807: which utility replacement in C Message-ID: <xzpzo4lwer4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20011214143727.A41700@sushi.linuxforlesbians.org> References: <200112132100.fBDL01r64612@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011214061809.83145A-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20011214070038.B38914@sushi.linuxforlesbians.org> <xzpd71hyhfi.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20011214143727.A41700@sushi.linuxforlesbians.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Sanchez <fut0n@linuxforlesbians.org> writes: > Struct rules, but understandable. I like the style(9) format, makes it > look much more structured and readable. Here ya go, I hope this is what > you had in mind. Yes, much better! Though the explicit "return" from void functions isn't necessary. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpzo4lwer4.fsf>